Comments on: Harrah’s Speaks about Jamie Gold

By: Short-Stacked Shamus

Short-Stacked Shamus — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:42:43 +0000

Oh . . . both were indeed heads-up situations, I believe.

By: DanM

DanM — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:59:15 +0000

yeah, but how many were in the hand? that’s what i was referring to.

By: Short-Stacked Shamus

Short-Stacked Shamus — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:57:50 +0000

Card-flashing hand occurred when they were three-handed. “Top-top” was with a full table.

By: on tilt

on tilt — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 05:01:22 +0000

in a tourny, under no circumstances can you expose your hand with action remaining….even heads up.

it doesn’t kill the hand, but should recieve a penalty

By: DanM

DanM — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:17:16 +0000

Was he heads-up at the time in these two hands? I always operated under the presumption that a lot more was fair game when heads-up. At least it should be, right?

By: Short-Stacked Shamus

Short-Stacked Shamus — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:51:44 +0000

I believe the “card-flashing” incident was at the final table (w/Binger). The other incident (“I said top-top”) was with 3 tables to go, but it was filmed as well (and was incl. in the ESPN broadcast).

By: on tilt

on tilt — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:57:06 +0000

didn’t these infractions take place at the final table?

how is it that half a dozen cameras and millions of people caught it, but the floor missed it when there was only one table to look after?