<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Poker Industry Continues to Disappoint Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-109135</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-109135</guid>
		<description>Hevad is an annoying putz.  He makes me have to forward through a lot of the WSOP coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hevad is an annoying putz.  He makes me have to forward through a lot of the WSOP coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-109134</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-109134</guid>
		<description>I still have to admit, Hevad&#039;s not so bad. He&#039;s just a kid, right? It&#039;s like he sees the whole poker experience as being in a video game. That&#039;s not so bad ... and he&#039;ll grow up.

But Humberto ... he should know better. He used to be beloved until he annoyed the fuck out of everyone. Too bad he&#039;s actually a pretty good player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have to admit, Hevad&#8217;s not so bad. He&#8217;s just a kid, right? It&#8217;s like he sees the whole poker experience as being in a video game. That&#8217;s not so bad &#8230; and he&#8217;ll grow up.</p>
<p>But Humberto &#8230; he should know better. He used to be beloved until he annoyed the fuck out of everyone. Too bad he&#8217;s actually a pretty good player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betfair Poker Player</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-109133</link>
		<dc:creator>Betfair Poker Player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-109133</guid>
		<description>I think that as soon as it ceases to make good television  then it will fade away. The audience obviously like it otherwise it would not be shown.

If the game is taken up by more people as a result of the coverage well that can&#039;t be a bad thing and for every Humberto there&#039;s likely to be a thousand Herberts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that as soon as it ceases to make good television  then it will fade away. The audience obviously like it otherwise it would not be shown.</p>
<p>If the game is taken up by more people as a result of the coverage well that can&#8217;t be a bad thing and for every Humberto there&#8217;s likely to be a thousand Herberts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: September Poker News &#124; Babes In Poker</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108488</link>
		<dc:creator>September Poker News &#124; Babes In Poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108488</guid>
		<description>[...] Schneider has put up a great article on his site Pokerati.com about how, The Poker Industry Continues to Disappointment me. He rants about how bad behavior, poor sportsmanship and people acting like weirdos is tolerated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schneider has put up a great article on his site Pokerati.com about how, The Poker Industry Continues to Disappointment me. He rants about how bad behavior, poor sportsmanship and people acting like weirdos is tolerated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider on the jackassization of poker : Poker News</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider on the jackassization of poker : Poker News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108428</guid>
		<description>[...] being represented by the worst the game has to offer, you&#8217;re not alone. Tom Schneider has an excellent blog post over at Pokerati that wonders why the bad behavior of people like Brenes and Kahn is not only tolerated, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being represented by the worst the game has to offer, you&#8217;re not alone. Tom Schneider has an excellent blog post over at Pokerati that wonders why the bad behavior of people like Brenes and Kahn is not only tolerated, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Hime</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108401</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Hime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 04:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108401</guid>
		<description>Violence - always the answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violence &#8211; always the answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108383</guid>
		<description>&quot;A social freeze-out sometimes works wonders.&quot;

And so does a good ol fashioned ass beating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A social freeze-out sometimes works wonders.&#8221;</p>
<p>And so does a good ol fashioned ass beating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venita</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108381</link>
		<dc:creator>Venita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108381</guid>
		<description>I agree that itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a little alarming Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Brenes has been annoying for a couple of years now, but NOBODY has ever annoyed me as much as the neanderthal Khan.  ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s sad Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and irritating -- that heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s never been taught to be a gracious winner.  

Don&#039;t know if it&#039;s true or not, but I heard a story once about a young pro Ã¢â‚¬â€œ whose initials are Scott Fischman Ã¢â‚¬â€œ who carried on to the point of annoyance when he busted someone out of a tournament.  T.J. Cloutier pulled him aside and said something to the effect of, Ã¢â‚¬Å“You do NOT act like that when youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve just ended someoneÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s tournament life.Ã¢â‚¬Â

I think the concern is that this kind of behavior will initiate a hundredth monkey effect Ã¢â‚¬â€œ that other young players will pick up on that kind of behavior and imitate it, until it has spread and become the norm.  

Maybe the pros can help.  If members of the poker community, especially the pros, unite in their universal contempt of such antics Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and possibly take it upon themselves to do what T.J. did to Fischman -- maybe the word will get around that such behavior is NOT cool.  A social freeze-out sometimes works wonders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s a little alarming Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Brenes has been annoying for a couple of years now, but NOBODY has ever annoyed me as much as the neanderthal Khan.  ItÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s sad Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and irritating &#8212; that heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s never been taught to be a gracious winner.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s true or not, but I heard a story once about a young pro Ã¢â‚¬â€œ whose initials are Scott Fischman Ã¢â‚¬â€œ who carried on to the point of annoyance when he busted someone out of a tournament.  T.J. Cloutier pulled him aside and said something to the effect of, Ã¢â‚¬Å“You do NOT act like that when youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve just ended someoneÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s tournament life.Ã¢â‚¬Â</p>
<p>I think the concern is that this kind of behavior will initiate a hundredth monkey effect Ã¢â‚¬â€œ that other young players will pick up on that kind of behavior and imitate it, until it has spread and become the norm.  </p>
<p>Maybe the pros can help.  If members of the poker community, especially the pros, unite in their universal contempt of such antics Ã¢â‚¬â€œ and possibly take it upon themselves to do what T.J. did to Fischman &#8212; maybe the word will get around that such behavior is NOT cool.  A social freeze-out sometimes works wonders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108380</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108380</guid>
		<description>***BJ, I love your energy, you are the man.***

How pissed is Tom going to be when RaiNKhaN gets a sponsorship deal with Red Bull?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***BJ, I love your energy, you are the man.***</p>
<p>How pissed is Tom going to be when RaiNKhaN gets a sponsorship deal with Red Bull?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108379</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108379</guid>
		<description>All of the above excepting anonymous assholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the above excepting anonymous assholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108336</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108336</guid>
		<description>Hey, this is great.  This is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to get.  

First, let me say that I&#039;m not a professional writer like some of you&#039;s.  Therefore, maybe I did not convey my point real well.

Here&#039;s what I meant to say.  Assholes suck.  People who hyper-celebrate when someone just got knocked out of the most important event of the year are assholes.  I hate to see assholes get all of the attention, because I hate assholes.

Uncle Ray, thanks for the dead horse beating idea at a featured table.  It should have made my list the first time.

Randy, I guess using my arm to emulate a swinging elephant trunk was a little too much exuberance for beating you out of a free meal.  Maybe just a quiet little booyah would have been more appropriate.

Thanks everybody for your comments, and BJ, I love your energy, you are the man.

Booyah oo oo aa aa.  I&#039;m eating a banana now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this is great.  This is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping to get.  </p>
<p>First, let me say that I&#8217;m not a professional writer like some of you&#8217;s.  Therefore, maybe I did not convey my point real well.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I meant to say.  Assholes suck.  People who hyper-celebrate when someone just got knocked out of the most important event of the year are assholes.  I hate to see assholes get all of the attention, because I hate assholes.</p>
<p>Uncle Ray, thanks for the dead horse beating idea at a featured table.  It should have made my list the first time.</p>
<p>Randy, I guess using my arm to emulate a swinging elephant trunk was a little too much exuberance for beating you out of a free meal.  Maybe just a quiet little booyah would have been more appropriate.</p>
<p>Thanks everybody for your comments, and BJ, I love your energy, you are the man.</p>
<p>Booyah oo oo aa aa.  I&#8217;m eating a banana now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Ray</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108335</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108335</guid>
		<description>BJ, I accept your observance and agree that it is probably a small part of the world of poker. But you need to ask yourself whether or not you need the non-players or at least the non-main event viewers to watch the shows in order to build the popularity of the game.

I know there is a built-in sponsor, the entry fee, so maybe you don&#039;t need new viewers. But public perception will be that the norm is to be obnoxious, not courteous and good a sportsman like you normally experience.

If you donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t need new viewers and new players that play the game in a sportsmanlike way, then youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re right. But if it is going to grow, new blood is always necessary. And if the only new blood has the perception that being obnoxious is the only way to fame and fortune in the world of poker, then it will ultimately pervade other eventsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦and final tablesÃ¢â‚¬Â¦and I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t think thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the direction you want the game to go.

And that takes us full circle, I think, because TomÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s original point before all the comments were made seemed to be that he was getting sick of the idiocy that is becoming more and more common. 

Okay, I&#039;m done. I&#039;ve probably said too much. I&#039;m sorry I&#039;m beating a dead horse (which someone may do at next year&#039;s main event).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BJ, I accept your observance and agree that it is probably a small part of the world of poker. But you need to ask yourself whether or not you need the non-players or at least the non-main event viewers to watch the shows in order to build the popularity of the game.</p>
<p>I know there is a built-in sponsor, the entry fee, so maybe you don&#8217;t need new viewers. But public perception will be that the norm is to be obnoxious, not courteous and good a sportsman like you normally experience.</p>
<p>If you donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t need new viewers and new players that play the game in a sportsmanlike way, then youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re right. But if it is going to grow, new blood is always necessary. And if the only new blood has the perception that being obnoxious is the only way to fame and fortune in the world of poker, then it will ultimately pervade other eventsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦and final tablesÃ¢â‚¬Â¦and I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t think thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the direction you want the game to go.</p>
<p>And that takes us full circle, I think, because TomÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s original point before all the comments were made seemed to be that he was getting sick of the idiocy that is becoming more and more common. </p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m done. I&#8217;ve probably said too much. I&#8217;m sorry I&#8217;m beating a dead horse (which someone may do at next year&#8217;s main event).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108334</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108334</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.poker-butler.de/typo3temp/pics/0f5c665760.jpg&quot; align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;Humberto is more painful to watch than RaiNKhaN, imho ... that&#039;s why I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the elder clown-statesman of poker knocked about his newfound younger friend. After all, Khan&#039;s thumbs-up move with Aces &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a pretty brilliant way to entice an all-in from Brenes! Nice score. 

But maybe he shoulda gotten a 10-yard penalty for excessive end-zone celebration.

While I pretty much agree with BJ, we shouldn&#039;t forget how extreme some of the celebrations really were. Not to be a safety asshole, but when RaiNKhaN climbed the feature table scaffolding and began to shake like Donkey Kong (which I don&#039;t think has been shown on TV yet) that put the whole integrity of the tournament at stake. I mean I am sure that set-up hadn&#039;t been tested to withstand that sort of activity. Can you imagine had something big and heavy come crashing down onto a table full of chips and people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.poker-butler.de/typo3temp/pics/0f5c665760.jpg" align="right"/>Humberto is more painful to watch than RaiNKhaN, imho &#8230; that&#8217;s why I thoroughly enjoyed seeing the elder clown-statesman of poker knocked about his newfound younger friend. After all, Khan&#8217;s thumbs-up move with Aces <i>was</i> a pretty brilliant way to entice an all-in from Brenes! Nice score. </p>
<p>But maybe he shoulda gotten a 10-yard penalty for excessive end-zone celebration.</p>
<p>While I pretty much agree with BJ, we shouldn&#8217;t forget how extreme some of the celebrations really were. Not to be a safety asshole, but when RaiNKhaN climbed the feature table scaffolding and began to shake like Donkey Kong (which I don&#8217;t think has been shown on TV yet) that put the whole integrity of the tournament at stake. I mean I am sure that set-up hadn&#8217;t been tested to withstand that sort of activity. Can you imagine had something big and heavy come crashing down onto a table full of chips and people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Jen</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108333</link>
		<dc:creator>California Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108333</guid>
		<description>Definitely not referring to Day 1 of the Main Event. I think this week was Day 3 or 4 with only about 50 players left in the field. Day 1 antics are always ridiculous at the WSOP, but this is serious poker and serious money, and these fools make it look like a meaningless reality TV show.

Sure, there is poker going on, and if you can block out the stupidity, you can see some interesting hands and the progression of the event. But it&#039;s difficult when they put the goofballs at the feature table and continually focus on them.

I&#039;ll agree that most players in poker are professional and conduct themselves with class, but it does seem to be the trend for young, American players (some of them) to act without any regard for other players or for the tradition of the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely not referring to Day 1 of the Main Event. I think this week was Day 3 or 4 with only about 50 players left in the field. Day 1 antics are always ridiculous at the WSOP, but this is serious poker and serious money, and these fools make it look like a meaningless reality TV show.</p>
<p>Sure, there is poker going on, and if you can block out the stupidity, you can see some interesting hands and the progression of the event. But it&#8217;s difficult when they put the goofballs at the feature table and continually focus on them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree that most players in poker are professional and conduct themselves with class, but it does seem to be the trend for young, American players (some of them) to act without any regard for other players or for the tradition of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108329</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108329</guid>
		<description>I still contend that you are all overstating the problem, continually referring back to Hevad Khan, Humberto Brenes, or the random idiots on Day 1 of the Main Event. This is *not* indicative of the current state of poker. 

WPT events are huge, but there are no costumes or other idiocy on day ones. The prelim WSOP events do not have these problems either. It is part of the carnival atmosphere of the Main Event, and I can accept that (even if I don&#039;t enjoy it). 

But to say that the antics of Hevad Khan and Humberto Brenes are indicative of the state of poker is highly misleading. With fields this large, there are always going to be a few exceptions, but the overall poker sportsmanship that I see week in and week out on the WPT is mostly professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still contend that you are all overstating the problem, continually referring back to Hevad Khan, Humberto Brenes, or the random idiots on Day 1 of the Main Event. This is *not* indicative of the current state of poker. </p>
<p>WPT events are huge, but there are no costumes or other idiocy on day ones. The prelim WSOP events do not have these problems either. It is part of the carnival atmosphere of the Main Event, and I can accept that (even if I don&#8217;t enjoy it). </p>
<p>But to say that the antics of Hevad Khan and Humberto Brenes are indicative of the state of poker is highly misleading. With fields this large, there are always going to be a few exceptions, but the overall poker sportsmanship that I see week in and week out on the WPT is mostly professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108328</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108328</guid>
		<description>I faithfully Tivo and watch the Main Events, and I love the ability to fast-forward through the idiots.  I would much rather see what the pros are doing, how they are playing, watch the chip leaders play, etc.  I also enjoy interviews with various tv and movie celebs, that sort of thing.

The antics are just annoying and absolutely appear to anyone with sense as camera posturing.  At one point while watching this year&#039;s main event, I even wondered out loud to my son, &quot;I wonder if they (ESPN or someone else) are telling this guy to keep up that junk for tv ratings?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I faithfully Tivo and watch the Main Events, and I love the ability to fast-forward through the idiots.  I would much rather see what the pros are doing, how they are playing, watch the chip leaders play, etc.  I also enjoy interviews with various tv and movie celebs, that sort of thing.</p>
<p>The antics are just annoying and absolutely appear to anyone with sense as camera posturing.  At one point while watching this year&#8217;s main event, I even wondered out loud to my son, &#8220;I wonder if they (ESPN or someone else) are telling this guy to keep up that junk for tv ratings?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBR</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108327</link>
		<dc:creator>TBR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108327</guid>
		<description>Color me not super-offended.  Yes, it&#039;s absurd and awful sportmanship, but ESPN still does a pretty good job of showing some interesting hands. WPT coverage is an all-in fest and allows for very little strategic coverage.  With the power of tivo, those of us that nerd-out on the interesting hands they do show can just FF through the lunatics and all the forced human interest stories (like that guy was REALLY blind. Please).  I&#039;ll take the good with the bad, and as has been pointed out, I&#039;ll definitely take the dead-money due to its popularity. 

Speaking of questionable sportsmanship, I&#039;d like to point out that I may have been the only person at the 2007 WSOP who bought Tom Schneider a meal (and did so AFTER he had POY locked up).  I say &quot;questionable sportsmanship&quot; because I was forced to do so after losing a rigged game of &quot;1 to 1,000&quot; proposed by Dan. I&#039;m not sure the ESPN cameras caught Dan and Tom&#039;s reactions to winning, but they were bush-league I can assure you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Color me not super-offended.  Yes, it&#8217;s absurd and awful sportmanship, but ESPN still does a pretty good job of showing some interesting hands. WPT coverage is an all-in fest and allows for very little strategic coverage.  With the power of tivo, those of us that nerd-out on the interesting hands they do show can just FF through the lunatics and all the forced human interest stories (like that guy was REALLY blind. Please).  I&#8217;ll take the good with the bad, and as has been pointed out, I&#8217;ll definitely take the dead-money due to its popularity. </p>
<p>Speaking of questionable sportsmanship, I&#8217;d like to point out that I may have been the only person at the 2007 WSOP who bought Tom Schneider a meal (and did so AFTER he had POY locked up).  I say &#8220;questionable sportsmanship&#8221; because I was forced to do so after losing a rigged game of &#8220;1 to 1,000&#8243; proposed by Dan. I&#8217;m not sure the ESPN cameras caught Dan and Tom&#8217;s reactions to winning, but they were bush-league I can assure you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Ray</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108324</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108324</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion GoodChuck. I also would say that the reason it is seen on WSOP and not WPT is that WSOP shows &quot;highlights&quot; from all rounds and it is before the final table that most of the nonsense goes on.

The WPT only shows the final table so most of the idiocy has already been dispensed with. 

And Jen, you are totally correct. It seems that too many people either forgot or never learned that to be a good sport you need to not be a sore loser AND not be an obnoxious winner.

But how do we teach our kids that when we glorify the antics of guys like TO, Randy Moss, (hell, half of the wide receivers in the NFL), many MLB pitchers (see Carlos Zambrano of the Cubs), many MLB batters admiring their home runs (see Aramis Ramirez of the Cubs)and any other &quot;look at me&quot; athlete? Don&#039;t even get me started on basketball players!!

It is now in our YouTube culture to make a spectacle of yourself. It&#039;s sad, really sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion GoodChuck. I also would say that the reason it is seen on WSOP and not WPT is that WSOP shows &#8220;highlights&#8221; from all rounds and it is before the final table that most of the nonsense goes on.</p>
<p>The WPT only shows the final table so most of the idiocy has already been dispensed with. </p>
<p>And Jen, you are totally correct. It seems that too many people either forgot or never learned that to be a good sport you need to not be a sore loser AND not be an obnoxious winner.</p>
<p>But how do we teach our kids that when we glorify the antics of guys like TO, Randy Moss, (hell, half of the wide receivers in the NFL), many MLB pitchers (see Carlos Zambrano of the Cubs), many MLB batters admiring their home runs (see Aramis Ramirez of the Cubs)and any other &#8220;look at me&#8221; athlete? Don&#8217;t even get me started on basketball players!!</p>
<p>It is now in our YouTube culture to make a spectacle of yourself. It&#8217;s sad, really sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108322</guid>
		<description>So the equation is simple.

Play like a bot/Don&#039;t Speak English/Be able to read your name on back of belt + Be an asshat on national television = Pokerstars noticing you.

So how did Daniel get there?  Oh yeah...his was as easy as FCP getting bought by Pokerstars.  Glad he did not have to stoop as low as being an asshat on tv.

I am glad Tom has come out and stated his opinion on this. Tired of hearing the other pros state things like &quot;Oh that is just how he expresses himself since his English is not that great.&quot;

I don&#039;t know a lick of Spanish but I can assure you if I were in an event way down south I would not be &quot;taunting&quot; my opponent with a donkey figurine and yelling &quot;Don-Key! Don-Key! HeeeHaw!  How do you say Don-Key in English?! Edwardo!&quot;

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the equation is simple.</p>
<p>Play like a bot/Don&#8217;t Speak English/Be able to read your name on back of belt + Be an asshat on national television = Pokerstars noticing you.</p>
<p>So how did Daniel get there?  Oh yeah&#8230;his was as easy as FCP getting bought by Pokerstars.  Glad he did not have to stoop as low as being an asshat on tv.</p>
<p>I am glad Tom has come out and stated his opinion on this. Tired of hearing the other pros state things like &#8220;Oh that is just how he expresses himself since his English is not that great.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know a lick of Spanish but I can assure you if I were in an event way down south I would not be &#8220;taunting&#8221; my opponent with a donkey figurine and yelling &#8220;Don-Key! Don-Key! HeeeHaw!  How do you say Don-Key in English?! Edwardo!&#8221;</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoodChuck</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/comment-page-1/#comment-108321</link>
		<dc:creator>GoodChuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/2007/09/26/the-poker-industry-continues-to-disappoint-me/#comment-108321</guid>
		<description>I suggest the following. If we go with the premise that ESPN records and broadcasts these idiots for the TV value then we report to EESPN, and their advertisers, how often viewers change the channel or stop watching the broadcast, as I did, whenever Humberto, Hevad, or anyone else &quot;actin a fool,&quot; is on. If they think it will affect there cash flow it will have an affect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest the following. If we go with the premise that ESPN records and broadcasts these idiots for the TV value then we report to EESPN, and their advertisers, how often viewers change the channel or stop watching the broadcast, as I did, whenever Humberto, Hevad, or anyone else &#8220;actin a fool,&#8221; is on. If they think it will affect there cash flow it will have an affect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

