Comments on: Re: Abslolute http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/ Texas Hold'em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Michael http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109503 Michael Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:44:51 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109503 "What I don’t get about the ZeeJustin thing is why he still gets coverage and press in poker media, despite being a known cheater." Because he's still winning live tournaments...........not sure what he does online now but he's had a bit of success in the traditional tourney format. “What I don’t get about the ZeeJustin thing is why he still gets coverage and press in poker media, despite being a known cheater.”

Because he’s still winning live tournaments………..not sure what he does online now but he’s had a bit of success in the traditional tourney format.

]]> By: Jimmy http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109476 Jimmy Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:00:08 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109476 What I don't get about the ZeeJustin thing is why he still gets coverage and press in poker media, despite being a known cheater. What I don’t get about the ZeeJustin thing is why he still gets coverage and press in poker media, despite being a known cheater.

]]> By: Fawcett http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109435 Fawcett Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:57:23 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109435 actually the link says "We have determined, based on the totality of evidence, that the tournament winner “TheV0id” was in breach of the PokerStars Terms of Service." As TBR is a lawyer I would expect him to be vague in his comments and links to avoid slander. Putz. actually the link says “We have determined, based on the totality of evidence, that the tournament winner “TheV0id” was in breach of the PokerStars Terms of Service.” As TBR is a lawyer I would expect him to be vague in his comments and links to avoid slander.

Putz.

]]> By: DanM http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109428 DanM Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:00:40 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109428 <a href="http://www.pokernews.com/news/2007/10/WCOOP-main-event-winner-disqualified.htm" rel="nofollow">The winner of the main event -- which paid more than $1.3 million -- was disqualified</a> when PokerStars discovered that he entered the tournament on five different accounts simultaneously. ZeeJustin-style self-collusion. Wait a minute, that's exactly what Randy posted. Well, I guess he made you click to find out ... he's a lawyer, so you can't expect understandable information from his ilk. You mean the other story? Absolute Poker. It's all over the internet, dudes. The former CEO of Absolute Poker has been virtually busted for looking at other players' cards in an Absolute tourney. Fucked-up, no? The winner of the main event — which paid more than $1.3 million — was disqualified when PokerStars discovered that he entered the tournament on five different accounts simultaneously. ZeeJustin-style self-collusion.

Wait a minute, that’s exactly what Randy posted. Well, I guess he made you click to find out … he’s a lawyer, so you can’t expect understandable information from his ilk.

You mean the other story? Absolute Poker. It’s all over the internet, dudes. The former CEO of Absolute Poker has been virtually busted for looking at other players’ cards in an Absolute tourney. Fucked-up, no?

]]> By: son of sue http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109424 son of sue Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:32:00 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109424 Didn't see the story. What happened? Didn’t see the story. What happened?

]]> By: Fawcett http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109422 Fawcett Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:27:45 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109422 what were the charges????? what were the charges?????

]]> By: DanM http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/comment-page-1/#comment-109408 DanM Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:37:54 +0000 http://pokerati.com/2007/10/18/re-abslolute/#comment-109408 That's semi-old news, The Big Randy, referenced by Big Robert yesterday. But at the same time, it provides quite the comparison. PokerStars is handling their cheating "scandal" very well. Of course it helps when your executives aren't the ones doing the cheating. That’s semi-old news, The Big Randy, referenced by Big Robert yesterday. But at the same time, it provides quite the comparison. PokerStars is handling their cheating “scandal” very well. Of course it helps when your executives aren’t the ones doing the cheating.

]]>