<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Absolute on Trial?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker on TV</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156948</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker on TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156948</guid>
		<description>Phil Tom&#039;s in the country last I heard, and returned to the US from overseas recently as well. If he were had been indicted why wouldn&#039;t he have been arrested. It&#039;s not like he&#039;s some overseas fugitive requiring them to keep the indictment sealed. The story doesn&#039;t make any sense to me. 

And G911 may occasionally be right, but they&#039;re much lower on the totem pole than the National Enquirer, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil Tom&#8217;s in the country last I heard, and returned to the US from overseas recently as well. If he were had been indicted why wouldn&#8217;t he have been arrested. It&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s some overseas fugitive requiring them to keep the indictment sealed. The story doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me. </p>
<p>And G911 may occasionally be right, but they&#8217;re much lower on the totem pole than the National Enquirer, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Jen</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156928</link>
		<dc:creator>California Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156928</guid>
		<description>Who is it? Tokwiro Enterprises, same folks who own UltimateBet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is it? Tokwiro Enterprises, same folks who own UltimateBet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156923</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156923</guid>
		<description>Who is Absolute Poker these days, anyhow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is Absolute Poker these days, anyhow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Jen</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156918</link>
		<dc:creator>California Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 04:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156918</guid>
		<description>Gambling911 has been on this story for awhile, and I find it hard to believe they would print this kind of information without proof. But I&#039;m just not sure how completely trustworthy the site is... And I&#039;m not sure how to verify it. And if Absolute Poker is coming back with a serious allegations that it&#039;s not true, it makes me wonder who is bluffing here.

I will try to look into it and see what I can come up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gambling911 has been on this story for awhile, and I find it hard to believe they would print this kind of information without proof. But I&#8217;m just not sure how completely trustworthy the site is&#8230; And I&#8217;m not sure how to verify it. And if Absolute Poker is coming back with a serious allegations that it&#8217;s not true, it makes me wonder who is bluffing here.</p>
<p>I will try to look into it and see what I can come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156912</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156912</guid>
		<description>Any legitimacy to 911&#039;s claims? I generally find that site sometimes to be on target, but sometimes off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any legitimacy to 911&#8242;s claims? I generally find that site sometimes to be on target, but sometimes off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/09/01/absolute-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-156911</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4369#comment-156911</guid>
		<description>That would be Phil Tom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be Phil Tom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

