<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RE: Kentucky Domain-Grab Hearing Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2008/10/07/re-kentucky-domain-grab-hearing-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/10/07/re-kentucky-domain-grab-hearing-today/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-Squared</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/10/07/re-kentucky-domain-grab-hearing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-158919</link>
		<dc:creator>G-Squared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4535#comment-158919</guid>
		<description>From what I can tell, Judge Wingate was appointed vs elected.  That is good.  If he had been elected and was up for re-election, that would certainly play into his decision so I hope for a fair decision.  I read the Gambling911 blog and it sounds like the defense attorney Leyden makes a good argument regarding the protectionist nature of KY&#039;s argument when KY has online horse racing domains at Churchill Downs.  Though Gambling911&#039;s blog may be biased to the poker community&#039;s interests, based on prosecuting attorney Foote&#039;s arguments or lack thereof, it sounds like Foote has his head &quot;deeply entrenched&quot;.  Perhaps he used KY jelly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can tell, Judge Wingate was appointed vs elected.  That is good.  If he had been elected and was up for re-election, that would certainly play into his decision so I hope for a fair decision.  I read the Gambling911 blog and it sounds like the defense attorney Leyden makes a good argument regarding the protectionist nature of KY&#8217;s argument when KY has online horse racing domains at Churchill Downs.  Though Gambling911&#8242;s blog may be biased to the poker community&#8217;s interests, based on prosecuting attorney Foote&#8217;s arguments or lack thereof, it sounds like Foote has his head &#8220;deeply entrenched&#8221;.  Perhaps he used KY jelly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

