<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro Blog Props</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-161011</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-161011</guid>
		<description>PS I&#039;ve added Liz Lieu&#039;s blog just for you, Shrink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS I&#8217;ve added Liz Lieu&#8217;s blog just for you, Shrink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-161007</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-161007</guid>
		<description>Hmm, just noticed PokerGrump&#039;s huge vote count. While I respect the ballot-stuffing, I think you need to have a listing in the Hendon Mob database to be considered a real poker pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, just noticed PokerGrump&#8217;s huge vote count. While I respect the ballot-stuffing, I think you need to have a listing in the Hendon Mob database to be considered a real poker pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-161006</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-161006</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;s probably good that Daniel is winning, because he&#039;s a true blogger, even if he doesn&#039;t type it himself. He posts his thoughts regularly, and interacts directly with the readers.

Likewise for some of the online pro blogs (Shaniac, Townsend, Annette 15, et al) ... these are clearly their personal works.

As to, say, Doyle Brunson&#039;s blog, or Phil Hellmuth&#039;s ... well I am sure they are pretty literally &quot;phoning it in&quot;, but Doyle&#039;s is definitely in his voice ... and Phil gets a bit personal in his, even if it makes you groan ... so I think they still count.

Let&#039;s face it, Shrink, if we could blog without actual typing ... we&#039;d SOOOO do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s probably good that Daniel is winning, because he&#8217;s a true blogger, even if he doesn&#8217;t type it himself. He posts his thoughts regularly, and interacts directly with the readers.</p>
<p>Likewise for some of the online pro blogs (Shaniac, Townsend, Annette 15, et al) &#8230; these are clearly their personal works.</p>
<p>As to, say, Doyle Brunson&#8217;s blog, or Phil Hellmuth&#8217;s &#8230; well I am sure they are pretty literally &#8220;phoning it in&#8221;, but Doyle&#8217;s is definitely in his voice &#8230; and Phil gets a bit personal in his, even if it makes you groan &#8230; so I think they still count.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, Shrink, if we could blog without actual typing &#8230; we&#8217;d SOOOO do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Shrink</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-160981</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-160981</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with your most recent poll Dan because I have no evidence that any of these poker pros actually write their own blog. Wait, I am sure Daniel does; but you and I and any blogger who has been on the tournament circuit has either been approached or knows someone who has or even is currently writing some pro&#039;s blog. So who are we voting for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with your most recent poll Dan because I have no evidence that any of these poker pros actually write their own blog. Wait, I am sure Daniel does; but you and I and any blogger who has been on the tournament circuit has either been approached or knows someone who has or even is currently writing some pro&#8217;s blog. So who are we voting for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason dalton</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-160866</link>
		<dc:creator>jason dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-160866</guid>
		<description>i am amazed that people really don&#039;t do any research before saying something.  If you look at the vote on HR 4940 you will see only 12 no&#039;s from senators.  http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2006-241.  none of these where running for pres.  so i guess no matter who you voted for you are letting poker down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am amazed that people really don&#8217;t do any research before saying something.  If you look at the vote on HR 4940 you will see only 12 no&#8217;s from senators.  <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2006-241" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2006-241</a>.  none of these where running for pres.  so i guess no matter who you voted for you are letting poker down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/11/14/pro-blog-props/comment-page-1/#comment-160801</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4787#comment-160801</guid>
		<description>I agree that Doyle has a great blog, but for some backstory, there&#039;s been 3 separate threads on 2+2 about Doyle&#039;s alleged racism:

http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog1 (the original thread in question, that mentions Doyle voting for McCain)

http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog2 (the thread in response to the &quot;racism&quot; charge, post 30 has me provide links and quotes to Doyle&#039;s wavering presidential choice on his blog)

http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog3 (where someone says that the posters of 2+2 apologize to Doyle)

All three threads have their moments of hilarity, flaming, off-topic  discussion, etc. that make the NVG forum so popular and hated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Doyle has a great blog, but for some backstory, there&#8217;s been 3 separate threads on 2+2 about Doyle&#8217;s alleged racism:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog1" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog1</a> (the original thread in question, that mentions Doyle voting for McCain)</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog2" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog2</a> (the thread in response to the &#8220;racism&#8221; charge, post 30 has me provide links and quotes to Doyle&#8217;s wavering presidential choice on his blog)</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog3" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/Doyleblog3</a> (where someone says that the posters of 2+2 apologize to Doyle)</p>
<p>All three threads have their moments of hilarity, flaming, off-topic  discussion, etc. that make the NVG forum so popular and hated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

