Comments on: South Carolina Court to Decide: Is Poker a Game of Skill? Kentucky courts update, too http://pokerati.com/2008/12/15/south-carolina-court-to-decide-is-poker-a-game-of-skill-kentucky-courts-update-too/ Texas Hold'em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Marvin C http://pokerati.com/2008/12/15/south-carolina-court-to-decide-is-poker-a-game-of-skill-kentucky-courts-update-too/comment-page-1/#comment-162139 Marvin C Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:52:02 +0000 http://pokerati.com/?p=4908#comment-162139 Two Points. In the early 90s, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that poker and blackjack were games of skill and didn't violate the state's constitutional ban against games of chance. It took a constitutional ammendment to get slots. I can't see the US Supreme Court allowing Kentucky to seize domain names. If they do, look for China to seize Google, Yahoo, and all the other profitable sites. At worst, Congress will pass a law outlawing this practice. Two Points. In the early 90s, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that poker and blackjack were games of skill and didn’t violate the state’s constitutional ban against games of chance. It took a constitutional ammendment to get slots.

I can’t see the US Supreme Court allowing Kentucky to seize domain names. If they do, look for China to seize Google, Yahoo, and all the other profitable sites. At worst, Congress will pass a law outlawing this practice.

]]>