<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Re: More problems at UB?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron A.</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/comment-page-1/#comment-162474</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4951#comment-162474</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but is it so difficult to withdraw your money from a poker site who is having computer issues? Why keep playing when you know things are going wrong. I stopped playing online poker about a year ago cause of the numerous bad beats that I experienced, and because I&#039;m not good at online poker anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but is it so difficult to withdraw your money from a poker site who is having computer issues? Why keep playing when you know things are going wrong. I stopped playing online poker about a year ago cause of the numerous bad beats that I experienced, and because I&#8217;m not good at online poker anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/comment-page-1/#comment-162471</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4951#comment-162471</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a hand from earlier this morning.  Note who gets part of the pot:


***** Hand History for Game 1165551082 *****
$100.00 USD NL Texas Hold&#039;em - Monday, December 22, 01:55:25 ET 2008
Table MANOR AVE (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Seat 5: ZERO TO HERO ( $263.55 USD )
Seat 1: MIKEP03 ( $40.00 USD )
Seat 2: DIRKY83 ( $230.36 USD )
Seat 3: NOGR ( $30.70 USD )
Seat 4: SPLITYAWIG ( $351.20 USD )
DIRKY83 posts small blind [$0.50 USD].
NOGR posts big blind [$1.00 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to ZERO TO HERO [ 8d 8s ]
SPLITYAWIG folds
ZERO TO HERO raises [$3.50 USD]
DIRKY83 folds
NOGR folds
ZERO TO HERO wins $2.50 USD from main pot
MIKEP03 wins $1.25 USD from main pot
ZERO TO HERO wins $1.25 USD from main pot

If this is correct, it would be the 4th noted &quot;glitch&quot; since Saturday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a hand from earlier this morning.  Note who gets part of the pot:</p>
<p>***** Hand History for Game 1165551082 *****<br />
$100.00 USD NL Texas Hold&#8217;em &#8211; Monday, December 22, 01:55:25 ET 2008<br />
Table MANOR AVE (Real Money)<br />
Seat 5 is the button<br />
Seat 5: ZERO TO HERO ( $263.55 USD )<br />
Seat 1: MIKEP03 ( $40.00 USD )<br />
Seat 2: DIRKY83 ( $230.36 USD )<br />
Seat 3: NOGR ( $30.70 USD )<br />
Seat 4: SPLITYAWIG ( $351.20 USD )<br />
DIRKY83 posts small blind [$0.50 USD].<br />
NOGR posts big blind [$1.00 USD].<br />
** Dealing down cards **<br />
Dealt to ZERO TO HERO [ 8d 8s ]<br />
SPLITYAWIG folds<br />
ZERO TO HERO raises [$3.50 USD]<br />
DIRKY83 folds<br />
NOGR folds<br />
ZERO TO HERO wins $2.50 USD from main pot<br />
MIKEP03 wins $1.25 USD from main pot<br />
ZERO TO HERO wins $1.25 USD from main pot</p>
<p>If this is correct, it would be the 4th noted &#8220;glitch&#8221; since Saturday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/comment-page-1/#comment-162463</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4951#comment-162463</guid>
		<description>Dan,

While I agree that people could be hoaxing just to get at UB, I could post a 3rd hand from later Saturday that shows someone losing more chips than expected from a Omaha Hi/Lo tournament.  That player did get refunded in tournament dollars for that incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>While I agree that people could be hoaxing just to get at UB, I could post a 3rd hand from later Saturday that shows someone losing more chips than expected from a Omaha Hi/Lo tournament.  That player did get refunded in tournament dollars for that incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/comment-page-1/#comment-162462</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4951#comment-162462</guid>
		<description>Actually, maybe I take the second part of that back ... if this sort of thing happened 10 times out of every million hands ... that would still be a serious problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, maybe I take the second part of that back &#8230; if this sort of thing happened 10 times out of every million hands &#8230; that would still be a serious problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2008/12/22/re-more-problems-at-ub/comment-page-1/#comment-162461</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4951#comment-162461</guid>
		<description>How do we know that this sort of thing isn&#039;t a hoax? I could see lots of creative photoshopping coming into play at this point.

At the same time, I could also understand if each site had a relatively infinitesimal number of glitches -- say something like this happened .001 percent of the time ... still thousands of hands, but not a big deal if it was known and always corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we know that this sort of thing isn&#8217;t a hoax? I could see lots of creative photoshopping coming into play at this point.</p>
<p>At the same time, I could also understand if each site had a relatively infinitesimal number of glitches &#8212; say something like this happened .001 percent of the time &#8230; still thousands of hands, but not a big deal if it was known and always corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

