<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chip Change at the Wynn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy S</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/comment-page-1/#comment-163933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4994#comment-163933</guid>
		<description>I noticed that as well in during my trip at the end of last year. I personally complained to the floor about the problem in 2007, and while I obviously can&#039;t take credit for the change, I hope my voice was one of many that caused the change.

As for the max buyins, the consensus I have heard is that that is usually a good idea as it allows the weaker players to stick around longer before they are bled dry. That said, the more skilled players tend to prefer playing deeper. It&#039;s also worth noting that playing deeper can attract the &quot;big gambler&quot; type that wants to play for more money.

A 300BB max in 2/5 is nice, as it allows deep play without being too scary. I also thought the $500 max for 1/3 is nice as well. Buying in for a rack just makes sense, giving a decent stack of 166BB.

Overall seems like good changes that more of the industry would be smart to adopt.

Also, for anyone interested, Tunica still has some 1/2 no max buyin games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that as well in during my trip at the end of last year. I personally complained to the floor about the problem in 2007, and while I obviously can&#8217;t take credit for the change, I hope my voice was one of many that caused the change.</p>
<p>As for the max buyins, the consensus I have heard is that that is usually a good idea as it allows the weaker players to stick around longer before they are bled dry. That said, the more skilled players tend to prefer playing deeper. It&#8217;s also worth noting that playing deeper can attract the &#8220;big gambler&#8221; type that wants to play for more money.</p>
<p>A 300BB max in 2/5 is nice, as it allows deep play without being too scary. I also thought the $500 max for 1/3 is nice as well. Buying in for a rack just makes sense, giving a decent stack of 166BB.</p>
<p>Overall seems like good changes that more of the industry would be smart to adopt.</p>
<p>Also, for anyone interested, Tunica still has some 1/2 no max buyin games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Alexander</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/comment-page-1/#comment-163873</link>
		<dc:creator>David Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4994#comment-163873</guid>
		<description>I remember playing there once several years back... and you&#039;d grab a stack of of chips thinking in your mind your making it $100 to go...

And it was really only $60....

Boy that screwed me up for most of the night....

I&#039;ll be in Vegas this coming weekend.... glad they changed it, might have to go visit...

Last time I was there a few months back... I enjoyed playing at the hard rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember playing there once several years back&#8230; and you&#8217;d grab a stack of of chips thinking in your mind your making it $100 to go&#8230;</p>
<p>And it was really only $60&#8230;.</p>
<p>Boy that screwed me up for most of the night&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be in Vegas this coming weekend&#8230;. glad they changed it, might have to go visit&#8230;</p>
<p>Last time I was there a few months back&#8230; I enjoyed playing at the hard rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/comment-page-1/#comment-163870</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4994#comment-163870</guid>
		<description>Ahh, very cool. Thanks for posting the link ... I didn&#039;t realize they had also removed the unlimited max buy-in in 1/3 and 2/5. Now some of the stuff people were saying at the table makes more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, very cool. Thanks for posting the link &#8230; I didn&#8217;t realize they had also removed the unlimited max buy-in in 1/3 and 2/5. Now some of the stuff people were saying at the table makes more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rakewell</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/12/chip-change-at-the-wynn/comment-page-1/#comment-163869</link>
		<dc:creator>Rakewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=4994#comment-163869</guid>
		<description>See here: http://www.allvegaspoker.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;t=62&amp;st=0&amp;sk=t&amp;sd=a&amp;start=165

(last post on the page)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See here: <a href="http://www.allvegaspoker.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&#038;t=62&#038;st=0&#038;sk=t&#038;sd=a&#038;start=165" rel="nofollow">http://www.allvegaspoker.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&#038;t=62&#038;st=0&#038;sk=t&#038;sd=a&#038;start=165</a></p>
<p>(last post on the page)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

