<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RE: 2009 WSOP Schedule Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164696</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164696</guid>
		<description>what is this triple chance and how do u get the extra chips</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is this triple chance and how do u get the extra chips</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zachdealer</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164292</link>
		<dc:creator>zachdealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164292</guid>
		<description>Getting rid of the rebuy&#039;s I think is great, it just takes too long for dealers to get each rebuy done. And not to mention it&#039;s the only way they have money short from dealer&#039;s screwing up and getting fired over not having the correct amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting rid of the rebuy&#8217;s I think is great, it just takes too long for dealers to get each rebuy done. And not to mention it&#8217;s the only way they have money short from dealer&#8217;s screwing up and getting fired over not having the correct amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164278</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164278</guid>
		<description>What&#039;d you say? I can&#039;t here you ... I think I&#039;ve got a bad connection. Can I call you back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;d you say? I can&#8217;t here you &#8230; I think I&#8217;ve got a bad connection. Can I call you back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164277</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164277</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dan.

Now it&#039;s time to work on your blog roll...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dan.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s time to work on your blog roll&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164276</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164276</guid>
		<description>NOTE: Kevin, I fixed the 39-38 ... just for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOTE: Kevin, I fixed the 39-38 &#8230; just for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164275</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164275</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;ll need to work on this one in future WSOPs. Sounds close to really cool, but a little off. Of course I&#039;m biased because I used to throw a big annual tourney that was a triple-chance tourney (Go Pokerati Invitational) that was a little different and therefore better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;ll need to work on this one in future WSOPs. Sounds close to really cool, but a little off. Of course I&#8217;m biased because I used to throw a big annual tourney that was a triple-chance tourney (Go Pokerati Invitational) that was a little different and therefore better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164274</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164274</guid>
		<description>From Seth Palansky, via Andrew Feldman at espn.com:



&lt;blockquote&gt; &quot;Essentially like a re-buy without paying for rebuying. You&#039;ll get a starting chip stack, and then two additional equal chip stacks to be used at any point you wish during the first two levels. So you can elect to take all three equal stacks up front, wait until you bust, add a stack anywhere in between.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Seth Palansky, via Andrew Feldman at espn.com:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;Essentially like a re-buy without paying for rebuying. You&#8217;ll get a starting chip stack, and then two additional equal chip stacks to be used at any point you wish during the first two levels. So you can elect to take all three equal stacks up front, wait until you bust, add a stack anywhere in between.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shronk</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164273</link>
		<dc:creator>shronk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164273</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s &quot;triple chance&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s &#8220;triple chance&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zero</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164272</link>
		<dc:creator>Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164272</guid>
		<description>Wonder why they deleted Pot Limit Holdem $2K?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder why they deleted Pot Limit Holdem $2K?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164267</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164267</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Andrew loves being wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Andrew loves being wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164266</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164266</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s me being a nit I suppose.  I did the same thing to Andrew Feldman over at espn.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s me being a nit I suppose.  I did the same thing to Andrew Feldman over at espn.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164265</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164265</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I see. They are counting 39 ... the real number is 38.

Sorry, my bad. It&#039;s become instinctive for me when it comes to facts, Kevin, to see yours and just ignore everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I see. They are counting 39 &#8230; the real number is 38.</p>
<p>Sorry, my bad. It&#8217;s become instinctive for me when it comes to facts, Kevin, to see yours and just ignore everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164262</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164262</guid>
		<description>Recall I noted there were 38 tournaments with a buyin of $2,500 and lower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recall I noted there were 38 tournaments with a buyin of $2,500 and lower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164261</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164261</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it ... what do you mean? Did they miscount something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it &#8230; what do you mean? Did they miscount something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/01/26/re-2009-wsop-schedule-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164260</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5280#comment-164260</guid>
		<description>The WSOP seems to think having two day 1&#039;s for an event (Event 4A/B) means it&#039;s two separate tournaments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSOP seems to think having two day 1&#8242;s for an event (Event 4A/B) means it&#8217;s two separate tournaments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

