<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russ Hamilton Speaks! Or Doesn&#8217;t &#8212; Same Difference!RawVegas gets what 60 Minutes couldn&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short-Stacked Shamus</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164855</link>
		<dc:creator>Short-Stacked Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164855</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;DanM Says:
February 10th, 2009 at 1:03 pm

@Shamus

So by that argument, yes, RH should clearly be treated as an enemy combatant and sent to Guantanamo.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry if I was misunderstood.  When I say it makes sense to dismiss the legal criteria here, I don&#039;t mean to imply some sort of punishment should be carried out outside of the law.  Rather, I&#039;m just referring to Tom&#039;s point about withholding judgment because the law sez &quot;innocent until proven guilty.&quot;  It doesn&#039;t appear Hamilton will ever be proven guilty of anything here (other than perhaps the tax stuff); thus, it doesn&#039;t seem to make sense to wait for the law to confirm/deny folks&#039; judgments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>DanM Says:<br />
February 10th, 2009 at 1:03 pm</p>
<p>@Shamus</p>
<p>So by that argument, yes, RH should clearly be treated as an enemy combatant and sent to Guantanamo.</i></p>
<p>Sorry if I was misunderstood.  When I say it makes sense to dismiss the legal criteria here, I don&#8217;t mean to imply some sort of punishment should be carried out outside of the law.  Rather, I&#8217;m just referring to Tom&#8217;s point about withholding judgment because the law sez &#8220;innocent until proven guilty.&#8221;  It doesn&#8217;t appear Hamilton will ever be proven guilty of anything here (other than perhaps the tax stuff); thus, it doesn&#8217;t seem to make sense to wait for the law to confirm/deny folks&#8217; judgments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164852</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164852</guid>
		<description>We are obviously all on pins and needles, KJGG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are obviously all on pins and needles, KJGG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kajagugu</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164842</link>
		<dc:creator>Kajagugu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164842</guid>
		<description>I am late to the party so I will go to the Al Capawned post and give you my insights there. Please stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am late to the party so I will go to the Al Capawned post and give you my insights there. Please stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164823</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164823</guid>
		<description>In the Arab world, there&#039;s no greater insult than hurling your shoe at someone. Tom, you should stake out RH on the golf course and do something similar. Just be sure you&#039;re not wearing soft-spikes that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Arab world, there&#8217;s no greater insult than hurling your shoe at someone. Tom, you should stake out RH on the golf course and do something similar. Just be sure you&#8217;re not wearing soft-spikes that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164820</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164820</guid>
		<description>ptooey Shamus?  Yes, I have seen it used before, but it sounds a little gay in the situation where I am spitting mad.  I knew a Greek guy that would say &quot;Ptoo you muther&quot;.  Yes, I think I like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ptooey Shamus?  Yes, I have seen it used before, but it sounds a little gay in the situation where I am spitting mad.  I knew a Greek guy that would say &#8220;Ptoo you muther&#8221;.  Yes, I think I like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164818</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164818</guid>
		<description>@Shamus

So by that argument, yes, RH should clearly be treated as an enemy combatant and sent to Guantanamo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shamus</p>
<p>So by that argument, yes, RH should clearly be treated as an enemy combatant and sent to Guantanamo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn Sandman</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164817</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughn Sandman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164817</guid>
		<description>A DIFFERENT TANGENT:

One thing I do not get about this whole scenario, is why people are not going after Phil Hellmuth, Annie Duke and any other UB-sponsored famous players.

I think we can all agree that no penalty is too severe for Russ, and we can all hope and pray that someday he&#039;ll get his. Ditto for any of his actual accomplices.

But when this whole thing broke, UB basically denied it until presented with clear proof. And it seems to me that Russ&#039;s access to super-user accounts had to be related to his onetime ownership stake in either UB or the software company that did its progamming. It was not some random dude who pulled this off from the outside...it was someone who was connected to UB.

Are my facts wrong? Do I not have this right? If so please correct me...

As far as I am conerned, well-known poker pros who failed to end their sponsorship and business partnerships with UB as soon as this scandal became public have condoned cheating and are at least tacit accomplices, albeit after the fact, of the crooks who cheated their fellow poker players.

As a community, why have we tolerated this?

I do not play on UB anymore, and I never will. It galls me to no end that other players continue to patronize their business and pay their rake. But Phil and Annie and others still walk around shilling for these scumbags and it seems like we&#039;ve given them a pass.

Maybe I&#039;ve missed public statements these pros have made condemning the cheating and offering assistance to players who have been scammed and the like, but I hardly think that is sufficient. Poker is a community where honor plays a significant role, and as far as I am concerned anything short of immediately and publicly ending all affiliation with UB means they have squandered theirs.

I think it would be fair and effective if every time they showed up to play a tournament wearing their UB gear, the other players at the table called the floor over to protest having to be seated with known cheaters. I have every intention of doing this myself should I be seated with them in the future.

Were it not for the collective efforts of the poker community, this scam would never have been uncovered. I would think it would be up to us to bring enough pressure to bear on enough visible people that those responsible are properly punished.

Let me be clear that I am not suggesting that Phil Hellmuth, Annie Duke or other UB pros participated in or profited from Russ&#039;s scam. I would imagine they are infuriated by it. But their continuing to profit from the organization that permitted it to happen and tried to cover it up entitles them to as much shame as we can heap upon them.

That&#039;s just my opinion, and as I stated above--if my facts or interpretation of them are incorrect, I hope someone will duly correct me and I apologize for my ignorance...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A DIFFERENT TANGENT:</p>
<p>One thing I do not get about this whole scenario, is why people are not going after Phil Hellmuth, Annie Duke and any other UB-sponsored famous players.</p>
<p>I think we can all agree that no penalty is too severe for Russ, and we can all hope and pray that someday he&#8217;ll get his. Ditto for any of his actual accomplices.</p>
<p>But when this whole thing broke, UB basically denied it until presented with clear proof. And it seems to me that Russ&#8217;s access to super-user accounts had to be related to his onetime ownership stake in either UB or the software company that did its progamming. It was not some random dude who pulled this off from the outside&#8230;it was someone who was connected to UB.</p>
<p>Are my facts wrong? Do I not have this right? If so please correct me&#8230;</p>
<p>As far as I am conerned, well-known poker pros who failed to end their sponsorship and business partnerships with UB as soon as this scandal became public have condoned cheating and are at least tacit accomplices, albeit after the fact, of the crooks who cheated their fellow poker players.</p>
<p>As a community, why have we tolerated this?</p>
<p>I do not play on UB anymore, and I never will. It galls me to no end that other players continue to patronize their business and pay their rake. But Phil and Annie and others still walk around shilling for these scumbags and it seems like we&#8217;ve given them a pass.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ve missed public statements these pros have made condemning the cheating and offering assistance to players who have been scammed and the like, but I hardly think that is sufficient. Poker is a community where honor plays a significant role, and as far as I am concerned anything short of immediately and publicly ending all affiliation with UB means they have squandered theirs.</p>
<p>I think it would be fair and effective if every time they showed up to play a tournament wearing their UB gear, the other players at the table called the floor over to protest having to be seated with known cheaters. I have every intention of doing this myself should I be seated with them in the future.</p>
<p>Were it not for the collective efforts of the poker community, this scam would never have been uncovered. I would think it would be up to us to bring enough pressure to bear on enough visible people that those responsible are properly punished.</p>
<p>Let me be clear that I am not suggesting that Phil Hellmuth, Annie Duke or other UB pros participated in or profited from Russ&#8217;s scam. I would imagine they are infuriated by it. But their continuing to profit from the organization that permitted it to happen and tried to cover it up entitles them to as much shame as we can heap upon them.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my opinion, and as I stated above&#8211;if my facts or interpretation of them are incorrect, I hope someone will duly correct me and I apologize for my ignorance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short-Stacked Shamus</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164814</link>
		<dc:creator>Short-Stacked Shamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164814</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me to dismiss usual legal criteria here b/c the case largely exists outside of legal jurisdiction.  That is to say, those who were stiffed by RH don&#039;t have legal recourse avail. to them.  (Of course, it sounds like the IRS apparently might -- but that&#039;s another issue.)  So, yeah, &quot;innocenct until proven guilty&quot; does ring hollow here.

Re: the appropriate onomatopeoia, high brow types generally go with &quot;ptooey.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me to dismiss usual legal criteria here b/c the case largely exists outside of legal jurisdiction.  That is to say, those who were stiffed by RH don&#8217;t have legal recourse avail. to them.  (Of course, it sounds like the IRS apparently might &#8212; but that&#8217;s another issue.)  So, yeah, &#8220;innocenct until proven guilty&#8221; does ring hollow here.</p>
<p>Re: the appropriate onomatopeoia, high brow types generally go with &#8220;ptooey.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164782</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164782</guid>
		<description>sorry Kevin, neither one of those work for me.  Anyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry Kevin, neither one of those work for me.  Anyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Shrink</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164744</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164744</guid>
		<description>Tom hit on one of the key elements of the whole UB scam. Loans were made to players, who then paid off in cash. It was a money laundering scheme using the hole card scam to get cash instead of online dollars. Now there is something the Feds could sink their rotten teeth into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom hit on one of the key elements of the whole UB scam. Loans were made to players, who then paid off in cash. It was a money laundering scheme using the hole card scam to get cash instead of online dollars. Now there is something the Feds could sink their rotten teeth into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164742</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164742</guid>
		<description>How about pshaw! or pffffft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about pshaw! or pffffft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Schneider</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164741</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164741</guid>
		<description>Screw innnocent until proven guilty.  That has become such bullshit.  Proven guilty does not mean anything.  Just because someone has not been proven guilty means jack shit to me anymore.  Our court system is too screwed up to use that as a basis to judge someone.  If you don&#039;t think Hamilton is guilty you are a dumbass, or you were on the O.J. jury.

Second, I&#039;m too lazy read back through the comments to see who said they would play golf with O.J. or Hamilton.  Dan, if that was you, have you learned nothing from me?  I can&#039;t tell you how disappointed i was to see Layne playing golf with the piece of shit.  That to me is what the video was about.  How the hell does the asshole find 3 other guys go play golf with?  (don&#039;t stop me about the preposition b.s., I&#039;m on a roll).

The one thing this video did was to get me so pissed again about this whole thing.  I have friends who borrowed money on their houses to pay off this asshole for loans he made to them while playing him heads up.  I don&#039;t have one ounce of innnocent until proven guilty left in me.  Had he done to me what he&#039;s done to others, I would for the first time in my life, (sans traffic tickets) feel good about breaking the law and living out the  rest of my life in prison knowing I had rid the world of one of the most dispicable people in the poker world.  i know that poker players around the world would visit me in jail.  At least the game would be good.  We&#039;ll play for cigarettes.

Innocent until proven guilty thooow!  OK, I don&#039;t know how to write a spitting noise like you high brow writers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw innnocent until proven guilty.  That has become such bullshit.  Proven guilty does not mean anything.  Just because someone has not been proven guilty means jack shit to me anymore.  Our court system is too screwed up to use that as a basis to judge someone.  If you don&#8217;t think Hamilton is guilty you are a dumbass, or you were on the O.J. jury.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m too lazy read back through the comments to see who said they would play golf with O.J. or Hamilton.  Dan, if that was you, have you learned nothing from me?  I can&#8217;t tell you how disappointed i was to see Layne playing golf with the piece of shit.  That to me is what the video was about.  How the hell does the asshole find 3 other guys go play golf with?  (don&#8217;t stop me about the preposition b.s., I&#8217;m on a roll).</p>
<p>The one thing this video did was to get me so pissed again about this whole thing.  I have friends who borrowed money on their houses to pay off this asshole for loans he made to them while playing him heads up.  I don&#8217;t have one ounce of innnocent until proven guilty left in me.  Had he done to me what he&#8217;s done to others, I would for the first time in my life, (sans traffic tickets) feel good about breaking the law and living out the  rest of my life in prison knowing I had rid the world of one of the most dispicable people in the poker world.  i know that poker players around the world would visit me in jail.  At least the game would be good.  We&#8217;ll play for cigarettes.</p>
<p>Innocent until proven guilty thooow!  OK, I don&#8217;t know how to write a spitting noise like you high brow writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerze</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164697</link>
		<dc:creator>kerze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164697</guid>
		<description>Guys - the reason he is wearing a clububt.com hat is because clububt.com is his company.  It&#039;s the former UB skin that he owns in conjunction with the Ultimate Blackjack Tour to set up online Elimination Blackjack Tournaments (domain registration is to Sanford Miller/Centaurus Games LLC - Sanford Miller is one of Russ&#039;s partners in the Ultimate Blackjack Tour).   AFAIK, Russ hasn&#039;t gotten ridden of his ownership in clububt.com and UB hasn&#039;t as far as I know disafffiliated clububt.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys &#8211; the reason he is wearing a clububt.com hat is because clububt.com is his company.  It&#8217;s the former UB skin that he owns in conjunction with the Ultimate Blackjack Tour to set up online Elimination Blackjack Tournaments (domain registration is to Sanford Miller/Centaurus Games LLC &#8211; Sanford Miller is one of Russ&#8217;s partners in the Ultimate Blackjack Tour).   AFAIK, Russ hasn&#8217;t gotten ridden of his ownership in clububt.com and UB hasn&#8217;t as far as I know disafffiliated clububt.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Shrink</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164695</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164695</guid>
		<description>Russ Hamilton is a thief but there are thousands of bigger thieves on Wall Street who have just about as much chance as Russ of ever seeing the inside of a court room. The lesson is, if you are going to steal, steal inside of the law or outside of any jurisdiction. 

Dan, I am OK leaving it to karma, but no one commenting on this site will ever see, feel or sense the ramifications of that karmic comeuppance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ Hamilton is a thief but there are thousands of bigger thieves on Wall Street who have just about as much chance as Russ of ever seeing the inside of a court room. The lesson is, if you are going to steal, steal inside of the law or outside of any jurisdiction. </p>
<p>Dan, I am OK leaving it to karma, but no one commenting on this site will ever see, feel or sense the ramifications of that karmic comeuppance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164693</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164693</guid>
		<description>Really BJ, we&#039;re gonna go Star Wars on this -- and Episode 4 no less?

Fair enough ... but yes, I think there&#039;s a reason Ken Lay died the way he did, there&#039;s a reason OJ Simpson is in prison for the next decade, and there&#039;s a reason Jeffrey Dahmer got taken out. Looking forward to seeing Dick Cheney&#039;s fate. 

I do hear what you&#039;re saying as it pertains to poker, though, as all of us have seen too often the &quot;bad people&quot; get rewarded while the &quot;good people&quot; are still struggling and grinding.

FWIW, I&#039;m not saying we should leave matters to The Force any more than we should leave them to the Kahnawake. But somebody, somewhere is going to see RH&#039;s hole cards, and that will prove to be very bad for him.

With that said, what would be an appropriate punishment for someone who &quot;allegedly&quot; unjustly enriched themselves by Hamilton&#039;s means? Prison would be a good place to start, but that&#039;s still not fun enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really BJ, we&#8217;re gonna go Star Wars on this &#8212; and Episode 4 no less?</p>
<p>Fair enough &#8230; but yes, I think there&#8217;s a reason Ken Lay died the way he did, there&#8217;s a reason OJ Simpson is in prison for the next decade, and there&#8217;s a reason Jeffrey Dahmer got taken out. Looking forward to seeing Dick Cheney&#8217;s fate. </p>
<p>I do hear what you&#8217;re saying as it pertains to poker, though, as all of us have seen too often the &#8220;bad people&#8221; get rewarded while the &#8220;good people&#8221; are still struggling and grinding.</p>
<p>FWIW, I&#8217;m not saying we should leave matters to The Force any more than we should leave them to the Kahnawake. But somebody, somewhere is going to see RH&#8217;s hole cards, and that will prove to be very bad for him.</p>
<p>With that said, what would be an appropriate punishment for someone who &#8220;allegedly&#8221; unjustly enriched themselves by Hamilton&#8217;s means? Prison would be a good place to start, but that&#8217;s still not fun enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164692</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164692</guid>
		<description>The video sparked discussion, but didn&#039;t add anything to it. I can spark discussion on a wide variety of topics without adding anything to the debate. That&#039;s not newsworthy.

Dan: &quot;Am I the only one here who believes in karma, and that in the end, this guy (and the company whose hats he wears) will get exactly what he deserves?&quot;

You expect Karma to take care of this? Anyone who believes in Karma hasn&#039;t learned from history. People very rarely get what they deserve, for good or for bad. 

My feeling on karma were summed up best by Han Solo: &quot;Kid, I&#039;ve flown from one side of this galaxy to the other, and I&#039;ve seen a lot of strange stuff, but I&#039;ve never seen *anything* to make me believe that there&#039;s one all-powerful Force controlling everything. &#039;Cause no mystical energy field controls *my* destiny. It&#039;s all a lot of simple tricks and nonsense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video sparked discussion, but didn&#8217;t add anything to it. I can spark discussion on a wide variety of topics without adding anything to the debate. That&#8217;s not newsworthy.</p>
<p>Dan: &#8220;Am I the only one here who believes in karma, and that in the end, this guy (and the company whose hats he wears) will get exactly what he deserves?&#8221;</p>
<p>You expect Karma to take care of this? Anyone who believes in Karma hasn&#8217;t learned from history. People very rarely get what they deserve, for good or for bad. </p>
<p>My feeling on karma were summed up best by Han Solo: &#8220;Kid, I&#8217;ve flown from one side of this galaxy to the other, and I&#8217;ve seen a lot of strange stuff, but I&#8217;ve never seen *anything* to make me believe that there&#8217;s one all-powerful Force controlling everything. &#8216;Cause no mystical energy field controls *my* destiny. It&#8217;s all a lot of simple tricks and nonsense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164691</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164691</guid>
		<description>***Poker Shrink expressed my thoughts better than I did. I should have simply said, â€œThat video added *nothing* to the discussion.â€***

Though I will point to the above 20something comments to dispute the definition of the word &quot;nothing&quot; ... I am OK with seeing this as the equivalent of junk food. 

Have you ever eaten potato chips? I&#039;m pretty sure you can&#039;t live off of them, but temporarily, for a blip, they can be oh-so-satisfying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Poker Shrink expressed my thoughts better than I did. I should have simply said, â€œThat video added *nothing* to the discussion.â€***</p>
<p>Though I will point to the above 20something comments to dispute the definition of the word &#8220;nothing&#8221; &#8230; I am OK with seeing this as the equivalent of junk food. </p>
<p>Have you ever eaten potato chips? I&#8217;m pretty sure you can&#8217;t live off of them, but temporarily, for a blip, they can be oh-so-satisfying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164690</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164690</guid>
		<description>We can argue all day of what&#039;s newsworthy ... imh-journalistic-o, the RawVegas guys get the difference in red-carpet coverage and black-carpet coverage. I for one am happy that some folks I kinda sorta know gave me a GLIMPSE into the life of a bad guy.

I mean heck, can you imagine how this would all go down if RH wore fur? He should feel lucky that people aren&#039;t throwing eggs at him in the grocery store. 

I&#039;m sure they will be soon, actually, or at least something equivalent. 

Am I the only one here who believes in karma, and that in the end, this guy (and the company whose hats he wears) will get exactly what he deserves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can argue all day of what&#8217;s newsworthy &#8230; imh-journalistic-o, the RawVegas guys get the difference in red-carpet coverage and black-carpet coverage. I for one am happy that some folks I kinda sorta know gave me a GLIMPSE into the life of a bad guy.</p>
<p>I mean heck, can you imagine how this would all go down if RH wore fur? He should feel lucky that people aren&#8217;t throwing eggs at him in the grocery store. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they will be soon, actually, or at least something equivalent. </p>
<p>Am I the only one here who believes in karma, and that in the end, this guy (and the company whose hats he wears) will get exactly what he deserves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164689</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164689</guid>
		<description>It feels good to have Earl and the Poker Shrink on my side. :)

Earl said, &quot;The comparisons of the Hamilton case to the Gowen/FTP issue is apples and oranges.&quot; 

You&#039;re absolutely correct, of course. I only meant to compare the standard advice from lawyers in pending legal situations -- SAY NOTHING! Your guilt or innocence is irrelevant to that advice, and the only time people talk about pending lawsuits is when there are extraordinary non-legal factors -- like politics. 

Poker Shrink said, &quot;And for the record, expressing an opinion that the interview added nothing to the discussion is not an endorsement of Russ Hamilton&quot;

Poker Shrink expressed my thoughts better than I did. I should have simply said, &quot;That video added *nothing* to the discussion.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels good to have Earl and the Poker Shrink on my side. <img src='http://pokerati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Earl said, &#8220;The comparisons of the Hamilton case to the Gowen/FTP issue is apples and oranges.&#8221; </p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely correct, of course. I only meant to compare the standard advice from lawyers in pending legal situations &#8212; SAY NOTHING! Your guilt or innocence is irrelevant to that advice, and the only time people talk about pending lawsuits is when there are extraordinary non-legal factors &#8212; like politics. </p>
<p>Poker Shrink said, &#8220;And for the record, expressing an opinion that the interview added nothing to the discussion is not an endorsement of Russ Hamilton&#8221;</p>
<p>Poker Shrink expressed my thoughts better than I did. I should have simply said, &#8220;That video added *nothing* to the discussion.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Shrink</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/02/05/russ-hamilton-speaks-or-doesnt-same-differencerawvegas-gets-what-60-minutes-couldnt/comment-page-1/#comment-164688</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Shrink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=5384#comment-164688</guid>
		<description>I, too, am with BJ. And for the record, expressing an opinion that the interview added nothing to the discussion is not an endorsement of Russ Hamilton. Just like being against a war is not being against the troops. There is a clear difference between blog-spew and journalism. Accusing BJ or anyone else here of supporting Russ Hamilton is just nonsense. 

What I wonder about is why everyone is so kind to Russ and the other crooks; why the &quot;Alleged Cheater&quot;? He did it! We all know he did it, the only problem is that he did it where no court has jurisdiction. So, yes he is going to get away with it. The bigggest angle shot in poker history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am with BJ. And for the record, expressing an opinion that the interview added nothing to the discussion is not an endorsement of Russ Hamilton. Just like being against a war is not being against the troops. There is a clear difference between blog-spew and journalism. Accusing BJ or anyone else here of supporting Russ Hamilton is just nonsense. </p>
<p>What I wonder about is why everyone is so kind to Russ and the other crooks; why the &#8220;Alleged Cheater&#8221;? He did it! We all know he did it, the only problem is that he did it where no court has jurisdiction. So, yes he is going to get away with it. The bigggest angle shot in poker history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

