If I were Annie, I would have picked Mellisa instead of Tom and let Joan deal with Tom, but she would have taken Joan’s right hand man, or girl. I would have sat Mellisa down and told her to keep quiet and do nothing and not included her in any decisions. Would have been more interesting.

ouch.

Tom was terrible on this show in the beginning and had a terrible work ethic. Here is a guy who has made a little money for himself over the years, yet when the Kodak rep was explaining the picture frame to Annie’s team, Tom was more interested in getting ONE for free. Annie asked him to settle down and Tom had this strange look on his face. That’s when I knew Annie was in trouble tonight.

Plus Donald is partial to blondes:)

I never was much of a Donald fan and tonight sealed the deal, DONALD were Tired………………of you.

After that, everything was rigged for the woman who gave the Lippenzaner Stallions herpes. It was so obviously rigged. Two of Annie’s team turned on her, the unfunny, pathetic comic who should be arrested for impersonating a comic, and cross-dresser Dennis Rodman whose lines against Annie were so obviously written.

Annie showed a lot of class, especially when the World War Two camp follower whore called all poker players Mafia.

Donald Trump manufactured insults to all poker players. Keep that in mind! Bear a grudge.

Johnny Hughes

Saved Searches

Trending Topics

* Apple Shampoo
* Joan Rivers
* Celebrity Apprentice
* #musicmonday
* #goodgirlsgobad
* Happy Mothers Day
* #startrek
* Goodnight
* Annie Duke
* #familyforce5

Apple shampoo?

Hey, she did have Hollywood Dave there!

But Joan’s closing argument was a mess.

Regarding UB, if one of Trump’s producers or a newspaper writer said, “Hey boss, apparently, the company that sponsors Annie Duke was involved in a scandal where one of the owners cheated people out of money.” “Really? What was Annie’s involvement?” “Um … she wasn’t involved at all.” That pretty much kills the story.

If you want to write a hatchet job on Annie, sure, you could include it. But hatchet jobs in the mainstream media are usually reserved for politics and superstars, and not reality TV shows. (Let’s face it, even with this show, they’re all B-listers at best.)

If you read the stuff that people are writing to @RealAnnieDuke (7,800 followers), it’s all positive messages of support (100%), or moaning about how Trump got it wrong or judged the competition unfairly.

If you read the stuff that people are writing to @JoanRivers___ (11,500 followers), the majority of it is positive, but a few tweets are mixed in (5% or so?) that are upset that Joan won.

Clearly, this doesn’t mean much and matters not at all. But I find it interesting nonetheless. Twitter is fascinating because it’s like eavesdropping on live conversations and people’s thoughts around the world. Truly instant feedback in a way that was never before possible.

But that’s my point … “the masses are asses” … and thus no one would do the necessary research to delineate where Annie was and was not involved.

I’m not saying it’s a certainty … just speculating it as a possibility. Annie obviously did a wonderful job. But I think she coulda won it with a different closing argument … and therein lies the real question I’m touching on: Would a different, er, final table performance for Annie have produced different results?

I think that Trump’s producers would view all of the online poker sites as pretty much the same. If they accept the concept of online poker (which they clearly did), then the UB scandal wouldn’t even be a consideration.

Just sayin’ … she mighta gotten lucky.

She closely studied last season, when Trump likely said, “You’re hired,” instead of “You’re fired.” She felt she deserved to win, so she expected to hear it. But once Trump dismissed all of her boardroom arguments, she should have seen the writing on the wall.