<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tao of Pokerati: HORSE by Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/06/27/tao-of-pokerati-horse-by-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/06/27/tao-of-pokerati-horse-by-numbers/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/06/27/tao-of-pokerati-horse-by-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-169283</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=9810#comment-169283</guid>
		<description>Tao of Soccerati?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tao of Soccerati?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauly</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/06/27/tao-of-pokerati-horse-by-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-169271</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=9810#comment-169271</guid>
		<description>You just blew our cover Sang.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just blew our cover Sang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SangyFarha</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/06/27/tao-of-pokerati-horse-by-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-169270</link>
		<dc:creator>SangyFarha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=9810#comment-169270</guid>
		<description>The Tinfoil series needs to be way more paranoid.  The fact you failed to mention Angela Landsbury in connection to the events of the past few days tells me you&#039;re either dilettantes or are in her employ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tinfoil series needs to be way more paranoid.  The fact you failed to mention Angela Landsbury in connection to the events of the past few days tells me you&#8217;re either dilettantes or are in her employ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

