<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sports Legends Challenge Shuts Doors after Venetian Lawsuit Unofficially canceled-canceled, not &#8220;postponed&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/10/05/sports-legends-challenge-shuts-doors-after-venetian-lawsuit-unofficially-canceled-canceled-not-postponed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/05/sports-legends-challenge-shuts-doors-after-venetian-lawsuit-unofficially-canceled-canceled-not-postponed/</link>
	<description>Poker News, Poker Skills, Poker Laws, Poker Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:06:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/05/sports-legends-challenge-shuts-doors-after-venetian-lawsuit-unofficially-canceled-canceled-not-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-173077</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12163#comment-173077</guid>
		<description>Hmm, you know, I almost deleted that graf (and the one above it) twice. Now obviously I can&#039;t. 

I kinda thought the deposit is what showed, yeah, we&#039;re serious about this deal, at which point they would really reserve necessary space. But without the deposit, you&#039;d say, &quot;nah, these guys are jokers, screw them.&quot;

But I guess if it&#039;s a super-huge reservation, it&#039;s not quite the same? Because if the cancellation fee was 150ish k ... then the booking musta been way more than that, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, you know, I almost deleted that graf (and the one above it) twice. Now obviously I can&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I kinda thought the deposit is what showed, yeah, we&#8217;re serious about this deal, at which point they would really reserve necessary space. But without the deposit, you&#8217;d say, &#8220;nah, these guys are jokers, screw them.&#8221;</p>
<p>But I guess if it&#8217;s a super-huge reservation, it&#8217;s not quite the same? Because if the cancellation fee was 150ish k &#8230; then the booking musta been way more than that, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F-Train</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/05/sports-legends-challenge-shuts-doors-after-venetian-lawsuit-unofficially-canceled-canceled-not-postponed/comment-page-1/#comment-173064</link>
		<dc:creator>F-Train</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12163#comment-173064</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Venetian lawsuit (vs. Hall of Fame World Poker Championship LLC*) actually seems a bit peculiar, since the alleged money-stiffage came even before SLC backed out on the necessary $26k deposit to reserve suites and conference space.&lt;/i&gt;

I think you&#039;re a little off here Dan.  The sequence of events as set forth in the Sun article is:

1. SLC and Venetian sign contract to reserve space. The upshot of this is that Venetian will no longer reserve that space for any other customer.
2. SLC misses deadline for $26k deposit.
3. SLC cancels reservation.
4. As per the contract, SLC cancellation triggers a cancellation fee of $173k.
5. Venetian tries to collect $173k fee and fails.
6. Venetian sues to enforce.

All pretty standard stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Venetian lawsuit (vs. Hall of Fame World Poker Championship LLC*) actually seems a bit peculiar, since the alleged money-stiffage came even before SLC backed out on the necessary $26k deposit to reserve suites and conference space.</i></p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re a little off here Dan.  The sequence of events as set forth in the Sun article is:</p>
<p>1. SLC and Venetian sign contract to reserve space. The upshot of this is that Venetian will no longer reserve that space for any other customer.<br />
2. SLC misses deadline for $26k deposit.<br />
3. SLC cancels reservation.<br />
4. As per the contract, SLC cancellation triggers a cancellation fee of $173k.<br />
5. Venetian tries to collect $173k fee and fails.<br />
6. Venetian sues to enforce.</p>
<p>All pretty standard stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
