<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RE: Bots on Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/10/07/re-bots-on-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/07/re-bots-on-trial/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/07/re-bots-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-173332</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12409#comment-173332</guid>
		<description>I tend to believe the part where they say they&#039;ll be able to show in due course that they are not running their own bots. 

But the part where multi-accounting justifies their confiscating funds ... that&#039;s something I don&#039;t think will hold up in court. It comes down to a question of who really &quot;owns&quot; the money in your account but not on the tables. 

If their view on that were to hold legal water, it would be like the IRS confiscating a paycheck because you smoked pot. Hey, that&#039;s a violation of the USA&#039;s TOC&#039;s, so sorry bub!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to believe the part where they say they&#8217;ll be able to show in due course that they are not running their own bots. </p>
<p>But the part where multi-accounting justifies their confiscating funds &#8230; that&#8217;s something I don&#8217;t think will hold up in court. It comes down to a question of who really &#8220;owns&#8221; the money in your account but not on the tables. </p>
<p>If their view on that were to hold legal water, it would be like the IRS confiscating a paycheck because you smoked pot. Hey, that&#8217;s a violation of the USA&#8217;s TOC&#8217;s, so sorry bub!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/07/re-bots-on-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-173331</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12409#comment-173331</guid>
		<description>Full Tilt responds, saying the claims are baseless and frivilous:

http://www.egrmagazine.com/news/industry/262212/full-tilt-responds-to-baseless-frivolous-law-suit.thtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Full Tilt responds, saying the claims are baseless and frivilous:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.egrmagazine.com/news/industry/262212/full-tilt-responds-to-baseless-frivolous-law-suit.thtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.egrmagazine.com/news/industry/262212/full-tilt-responds-to-baseless-frivolous-law-suit.thtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

