<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Steam for Anti-UIGEA Measures?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/10/29/new-steam-for-anti-uigea-measures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/29/new-steam-for-anti-uigea-measures/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisC</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/29/new-steam-for-anti-uigea-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-173579</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12749#comment-173579</guid>
		<description>I think that the 10 billion number is more accurate.  I know the numbers in KY alone are very high.  With all the local press concerning the banning of online play here.  I can&#039;t imagine that 52 billion would be right,  that would take a tremendous amount of money to generate those taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the 10 billion number is more accurate.  I know the numbers in KY alone are very high.  With all the local press concerning the banning of online play here.  I can&#8217;t imagine that 52 billion would be right,  that would take a tremendous amount of money to generate those taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/29/new-steam-for-anti-uigea-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-173573</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12749#comment-173573</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great question. I think it&#039;s because the $60 billion number came from Price-Watershouse-Cooper, and this estimate came from someone else ... House Bill and Senate Bills moving semi-independently?

Just kinda an educated guess on my part. We&#039;ll see if someone more informed can explain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great question. I think it&#8217;s because the $60 billion number came from Price-Watershouse-Cooper, and this estimate came from someone else &#8230; House Bill and Senate Bills moving semi-independently?</p>
<p>Just kinda an educated guess on my part. We&#8217;ll see if someone more informed can explain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mathers</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/29/new-steam-for-anti-uigea-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-173570</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12749#comment-173570</guid>
		<description>How come the estimate went down $10 billion from just a few months ago:

http://onlinesportshandicappers.com/news/industry/online-gambling-ban-reduces-us-income-by-$52-billion-022609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come the estimate went down $10 billion from just a few months ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinesportshandicappers.com/news/industry/online-gambling-ban-reduces-us-income-by-$52-billion-022609.html" rel="nofollow">http://onlinesportshandicappers.com/news/industry/online-gambling-ban-reduces-us-income-by-$52-billion-022609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

