<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BWOTEOW: 10/31/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/</link>
	<description>Poker News, Poker Skills, Poker Laws, Poker Lives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:01:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ChrisC</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/comment-page-1/#comment-173635</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12838#comment-173635</guid>
		<description>You could do BEOWW-&quot;Big Every Other Week Winner&quot;. It&#039;s not that much shorter but it seems to give the same info with less words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could do BEOWW-&#8221;Big Every Other Week Winner&#8221;. It&#8217;s not that much shorter but it seems to give the same info with less words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/comment-page-1/#comment-173632</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12838#comment-173632</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but you know how complicated the phrases &quot;biweekly&quot; and &quot;bimonthly&quot; and &quot;semimonthly&quot; can get ... don&#039;t want to confuse the readers into thinking they are getting something TWICE a week. 

And as much as I really wanted to do Big Losers of the Week (BLOW) ... I lost that internal debate.

If you&#039;d like to volunteer to do this winner&#039;s feature every other week, btw BJ, I&#039;d be happy to let you call it (almost) anything you want! :)

For now, we&#039;re stickin&#039; with BWOTEOW, aka Big Winners of the Every Other Week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but you know how complicated the phrases &#8220;biweekly&#8221; and &#8220;bimonthly&#8221; and &#8220;semimonthly&#8221; can get &#8230; don&#8217;t want to confuse the readers into thinking they are getting something TWICE a week. </p>
<p>And as much as I really wanted to do Big Losers of the Week (BLOW) &#8230; I lost that internal debate.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like to volunteer to do this winner&#8217;s feature every other week, btw BJ, I&#8217;d be happy to let you call it (almost) anything you want! <img src='http://pokerati.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For now, we&#8217;re stickin&#8217; with BWOTEOW, aka Big Winners of the Every Other Week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/comment-page-1/#comment-173631</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12838#comment-173631</guid>
		<description>The name seems a little long and over-complicated. Have you considered calling this something simpler, like &quot;Biweekly Big Winners&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name seems a little long and over-complicated. Have you considered calling this something simpler, like &#8220;Biweekly Big Winners&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisC</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/10/31/bwoteow-103109/comment-page-1/#comment-173630</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=12838#comment-173630</guid>
		<description>Maybe Howard can start to produce some results on high stakes poker.  He play&#039;s so terrible during those tapings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Howard can start to produce some results on high stakes poker.  He play&#8217;s so terrible during those tapings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
