Poker after dark?

just a bit help and i get pics unlocked

Thanks, Sang! I kinda consider myself a political sophomore …

Poker players are playing for millions of dollars on TV. Sooner or later, Obama will need cash to pay for everything and guess where the IRS will start showing up in droves? The IRS loves making examples of famous people, see e.g. Wesley Snipes, the fat naked guy that won Survivor, Pete Rose, and so on. I hope all of the people here that play for a living are keeping their books in order.

You must be on welfare then.

If you actually work for a living, then sooner or later you will be paying for Mr. Obama’s spending. Funny how the poker community is so big into Obama simply because of online poker.

It really would be amusing in a world-destruction sorta way if a superpowerful political leader went on Matusow-like tilt.

Looking at it again, I can see why Englund didn’t clarify the stuffing out of the sentence because explaining online multi-tabling to an audience that really doesn’t know or care about it isn’t going to make his point.

However, when I was playing poker last night, the host of our home game said that when you multi-table, it’s possible to be on tilt less because if you’re running awesome at one table, it could offset a horrible run at another so your variance for the night might not be that bad.

online it is closer to what he describes. but that could actually support Englund’s premise, not detract from it.

Oh, so sad for a great article to be tripped up by this one line because it’s a known fact that some online players multi-table and there’s also proof that players at the WSOP were blinded off as they flitted between tournaments.

Your use of the word “communism” shows you don’t really understand what the Bolshevik revolution was all about, too. Do you really want to get in this debate? Because “your people” — you know, the ones who were rallying around the concept of “Country First” but when push comes to shove are most upset about their personal bottom lines than anything else — are definitely lacking anyone who can make the plausibly legitimate conservative arguments without surrounding themselves with idiots. I mean that with all due respect.

BTW, have you ever been to a communist country? I have … multiple times in fact. If you think we are even close … well LOLOL. Would it seem rather communist if a government forced a group of underage (meaning they have no vote) citizens to inject a “vaccine” into their bodies? Because that’s what uber-Republican Rick Perry did. The only non-Commie part is how his friends who make the vaccine got really rich on his “executive decision” (which means there was no congressional vote on the matter).

Cut your whiney, frightened, fear-mongered right-wing bullshit and just play the game. We’ll see where the cards fall. I’m in no way implying Obama is the messiah or the solution to anything. You are welcome to fold if you must. In fact, let me borrow a phrase from your people in referring to the USA: Love it or leave it!

But of course to do that you would have to get a passport …

The crux of this article is that Obama is thoughtful and deliberate, like a lot of good poker players. He may or may not be making the wrong decisions, but the “change” I am happy to see is someone finally being thoughtful, not insta-reactive and falling into America’s opponents traps one after the other.