<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More than Rumorati: Full Tilt Boycotting NAPT? Branding Wars escalate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and Las Vegas WSOP Poker Blog, now with PLO too!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joey7</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-179618</link>
		<dc:creator>joey7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 07:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-179618</guid>
		<description>&lt;/b&gt;Boycotting may be too strong a word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycotting may be too strong a word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175780</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175780</guid>
		<description>Team Full Tilt is not allowed to play.  The garden variety red letter pros can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Team Full Tilt is not allowed to play.  The garden variety red letter pros can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve hall</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175735</link>
		<dc:creator>steve hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175735</guid>
		<description>With Scott Clements,Carlos M,Mike the Mouth and Ben Roberts pretty much the only name players left at the LAPC I asked one if he was barred from playing. The reply was &quot;I am staying here for the cash games. I could win six figures this weekend.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Scott Clements,Carlos M,Mike the Mouth and Ben Roberts pretty much the only name players left at the LAPC I asked one if he was barred from playing. The reply was &#8220;I am staying here for the cash games. I could win six figures this weekend.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnZ</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175734</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175734</guid>
		<description>Stars abandoned their ban on Poker After Dark long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stars abandoned their ban on Poker After Dark long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanM</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175732</link>
		<dc:creator>DanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175732</guid>
		<description>just to be clear, it seems there may be a difference in Team Full Tilt and the red pros in all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just to be clear, it seems there may be a difference in Team Full Tilt and the red pros in all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horse poker</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175729</link>
		<dc:creator>horse poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175729</guid>
		<description>Yes, If you listened to the podcast, they said it started with Pokerstars originally not letting FTP pro wear gear at final table, then they has to call PS corporate to approve.  Then PS said OK but sponsored all the amateurs at the table.  I didn&#039;t know Pokerstars didnt allow it&#039;s players to go on Poker After Dark. Maybe that started it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, If you listened to the podcast, they said it started with Pokerstars originally not letting FTP pro wear gear at final table, then they has to call PS corporate to approve.  Then PS said OK but sponsored all the amateurs at the table.  I didn&#8217;t know Pokerstars didnt allow it&#8217;s players to go on Poker After Dark. Maybe that started it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOCurmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175728</link>
		<dc:creator>TOCurmudgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175728</guid>
		<description>On Tilt, you make perfect sense.  The problem is that this appears to have started with Stars banning its players from Poker After Dark.  Now, both sides appear to be digging in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tilt, you make perfect sense.  The problem is that this appears to have started with Stars banning its players from Poker After Dark.  Now, both sides appear to be digging in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Tilt</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/02/17/full-tilt-boycotting-napt-branding-wars-escalate/comment-page-1/#comment-175723</link>
		<dc:creator>On Tilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=15124#comment-175723</guid>
		<description>Is there any upside to this?  Any good at all that can come FTP players abstaining from these tournies?

If they play in a tourny, especially a charity tourny of some sort, it can enhance the public perception of the poker player in general. Even if it&#039;s just another standard cash tourny, the exposure of top name, recognizable players is a plus.  The more that these guys become likable, household names to people(especially outside of the core poker playing community), the greater the chances of furthering poker&#039;s cuase.  

I think that the more public stuff like this becomes, the more it paints poker, the players, and the industry as being greedy and self-serving. 

Being someone living in Texas and wanting to see poker come to Texas, I can only see this as being a potential setback.  But now that I think about it, I don&#039;t know that FTP is really interested in legalized poker in Texas, except that they can still deposit money on their site.

Principally, I can understand understand why FTP would not want their top dogs playing in a &quot;Stars&quot; tournament.  I get it.  But I don&#039;t think that the higher ups have really thought it through.  What they gain by keeping them out, or that Stars would gain by having them participate is negligible at best.  On the other hand, if they play, then poker remains a community, regardless of affiliation.  And I believe that would be best for the community in the long run.

Besides, what could be better for FTP than to have 2 or 3 of their big name pros seated at the final table of a &quot;Stars&quot; tourny...or even win it.

It&#039;s still early and I haven&#039;t finished my first caffeinated beverage of the day.  Maybe I haven&#039;t thought it through yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any upside to this?  Any good at all that can come FTP players abstaining from these tournies?</p>
<p>If they play in a tourny, especially a charity tourny of some sort, it can enhance the public perception of the poker player in general. Even if it&#8217;s just another standard cash tourny, the exposure of top name, recognizable players is a plus.  The more that these guys become likable, household names to people(especially outside of the core poker playing community), the greater the chances of furthering poker&#8217;s cuase.  </p>
<p>I think that the more public stuff like this becomes, the more it paints poker, the players, and the industry as being greedy and self-serving. </p>
<p>Being someone living in Texas and wanting to see poker come to Texas, I can only see this as being a potential setback.  But now that I think about it, I don&#8217;t know that FTP is really interested in legalized poker in Texas, except that they can still deposit money on their site.</p>
<p>Principally, I can understand understand why FTP would not want their top dogs playing in a &#8220;Stars&#8221; tournament.  I get it.  But I don&#8217;t think that the higher ups have really thought it through.  What they gain by keeping them out, or that Stars would gain by having them participate is negligible at best.  On the other hand, if they play, then poker remains a community, regardless of affiliation.  And I believe that would be best for the community in the long run.</p>
<p>Besides, what could be better for FTP than to have 2 or 3 of their big name pros seated at the final table of a &#8220;Stars&#8221; tourny&#8230;or even win it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still early and I haven&#8217;t finished my first caffeinated beverage of the day.  Maybe I haven&#8217;t thought it through yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

