<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pokerati &#187; Barbara Boxer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/tag/barbara-boxer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and WSOP Poker Blog with Las Vegas PLO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Advice to Congresswomen Opposing Online Poker Bills: Man Up?</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/advice-to-congresswomen-opposing-online-poker-bills-man-up/</link>
		<comments>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/advice-to-congresswomen-opposing-online-poker-bills-man-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Jen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Gregoire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maxine Waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nolan-dalla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-poker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UIGEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=11919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nolan Dalla&#8217;s latest article on Poker News Daily has a point. Much of the focus is on the men who helped pass the UIGEA, giving little attention to the powerful women in Congress who now oppose our attempts to pass reasonable online poker regulation bills. No argument on that, but when he cites the female [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pokernewsdaily.com/legal-online-pokers-biggest-obstacle-nanny-democrats-4945/" rel="nofollow">Nolan Dalla&#8217;s latest article on Poker News Daily</a> has a point. Much of the focus is on the men who helped pass the UIGEA, giving little attention to the powerful women in Congress who now oppose our attempts to pass reasonable online poker regulation bills. No argument on that, but when he cites the female members of Congress who stand in the way of positive change, he lists:</p>
<p>Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)<br />
Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA)<br />
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)<br />
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)<br />
Gov. Christine Gregoire (D-WA)</p>
<p>Ummm, the last person is a governor! While she certainly screwed up online poker in Washington in a major way, she has little to do with the passage, or lack thereof, of federal legislation. Methinks Mr. Dalla got a little carried away with women who are &#8220;bad for poker.&#8221;</p>
<p>His advice to the PPA and the voting public is well-taken, though. The PPA should consider refocusing its media attempts at constituents who can make a difference, whether by votes or campaign donations. His closing remarks after the break:</p>
<p><span id="more-11919"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>For far too long, groups like the Poker Players Alliance (PPA) believe they can win the political debate with simple logic.  Sure, our argument is better than their argument and most rational people would agree after listing to a five-minute exchange, but this isnâ€™t a high school debate class.  Itâ€™s a political street fight versus powerful forces camped out on both the right and the left.  Until the PPA rolls up its sleeves and dives into the trenches with an all-out media bombardment aimed directly at the oblivious mainstream voter, nothing is going to change.  Sure, we might sway a few Ivy League professors and political columnists from time to time.  A few poker players might get five minutes of airtime on MSNBC or FOX.  Thatâ€™s all good, but online poker is not going to be legalized and regulated in the United States until some significant changes in strategy take place.</p>
<p>The first rule of politics is that â€œrightâ€ and â€œwrongâ€ have little to do with any issue of significance.  The debate you see on C-SPAN is pretty much scripted and irrelevant.  No Congressman or Senator is swayed one way or the other on any legislation without either coercion or compromise.</p>
<p>Indeed, Washington is nothing more than a gigantic power plant fueled by the only lubricant of any real action â€“ money.  Lots of money.  Whatever your political views may be, I strongly advise against poker players donating money to national party organizations.  If you support a political candidate, donate to the person directly and not to the Democratic National Committee or to the Republican National Committee.  If you make a donation to either of these organizations, thereâ€™s a good chance some of your money is going to be funneled into the re-election campaigns of Kyl and Pelosi.  Just say no.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/advice-to-congresswomen-opposing-online-poker-bills-man-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: pokerati.com @ 2012-05-27 05:16:03 -->
