<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pokerati &#187; Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerati.com/tag/commerce-holdem-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerati.com</link>
	<description>Texas Hold&#039;em and WSOP Poker Blog with Las Vegas PLO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:06:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RE: The PPA vs. California Casinos</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2010/09/re-the-ppa-vs-california-casinos/</link>
		<comments>http://pokerati.com/2010/09/re-the-ppa-vs-california-casinos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gahagan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How a Bill May or May Not Become a Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instapoker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Hold'em Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce-casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR 2267]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker-politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the PPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=19754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the PPA&#8217;s petition has already received more than 7000 signatures, including most of poker&#8217;s top professionals, the PPA is not letting up on the Commerce Casino for its vocal opposition to HR 2267. Responding to the Commerce&#8217;s response (to a response to a response?), the PPA points to the law as written and shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the <a href="http://playersbeforeprofits.com">PPA&#8217;s petition</a> has already received more than 7000 signatures, including most of poker&#8217;s top professionals, the PPA is not letting up on the Commerce Casino for its vocal opposition to HR 2267. Responding to the Commerce&#8217;s response (to a <a href="http://pokerati.com/2010/08/29/the-ppa-vs-california-card-rooms-fires-flare-over-commerce-opposition-to-online-gambling-bill/">response to a response</a>?), the PPA points to the law as written and shows how most of the Commerce&#8217;s supposed concerns were addressed in amendments. The PPA wants players to see how California casinos are really making a protectionist money grab but trying to disguise it as a bold stand to protect poker players worldwide.  </p>
<p>PPA Excutive Director John Pappas told PokerNews&#8217; Matthew Kredell he will stop supporting Commerce events, but stopped short of calling for an all-out boycott:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We didn&#8217;t think that was appropriate. Players will make that decision on their own. But you see the number of professional players who signed the letter. I know Commerce will be holding a lot of high-profile events in the future. Some pros might question whether to attend.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Follow coverage of the PPA&#8217;s crusade to get Commerce officials to change their minds  <a href="http://theppa.org/special/commerce-casino/">here</a>. Meanwhile, the Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series gets underway <a href="http://twitter.com/savagepoker">today</a>, </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerati.com/2010/09/re-the-ppa-vs-california-casinos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Player to Watch: Vinnie Vinh</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/player-to-watch-vinnie-vinh/</link>
		<comments>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/player-to-watch-vinnie-vinh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Michalski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008-wsop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Hold'em Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA-Poker-Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men-the-Master-Nguyen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tournament-Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vinnie-vinh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=11997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t call it a comeback &#8230; Vinnie Vinh, from Houston, had done little on the tournament scene since his chair finished 3rd in a limit hold&#8217;em event at the &#8217;08 WSOP. But he did book a 14th place finish in a $970 No-Limit tourney at the LA Poker Classic in February &#8230; and check out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t call it a comeback &#8230; Vinnie Vinh, from Houston, had done little on the tournament scene since <a href="http://www.rawvegas.tv/watch/the-toke/4426a45643d2c38fdf8999f5325930">his chair finished 3rd</a> in a limit hold&#8217;em event at the &#8217;08 WSOP. But he did book a 14th place finish in a $970 No-Limit tourney at the LA Poker Classic in February &#8230; and check out results of Event #10 &#8212; a $335 NLH &#8212; at the Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series:</p>
<blockquote><p><center><img src="http://pokerati.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/vinnie-vinh-commerce.jpg" alt="" width="370" height="297" class="attachment wp-att-11998 " /></p>
<p><strong>EVENT #10 $335 NO LIMIT HOLD&#8217;EM </strong><br />
ENTRIES  152     PRIZE POOL $43,776</p>
<p>PLACE NAME/HOMETOWN PRIZE<br />
1 Vinnie Vinh, Houston, TX $14,006 plus $2,580 Seat<br />
2 David Lopez, Tucson, AZ $7,486<br />
3 Pho Tran, West Covina, CA $4,772<br />
4 Glenn Forster, Los Angeles, CA $3,502<br />
5 Huy Quach, West Covina, CA $2,845<br />
6 Derwin Lowery, Los Angeles, CA $2,145<br />
7 David Liau, Los Angeles, CA $1,707<br />
8 Dono Terranova, Los Angeles, CA $1,270<br />
9 Patrick Karschamroon, Los Angeles, CA $919<br />
10 Adam Weinraub, Orange, CA $657<br />
11 Nhut Tran, Norwalk, CA $657<br />
12 Panayotis Kalessis, Los Angeles, CA $657<br />
13 Impounh Vongvone, Los Angeles, CA $569<br />
14 Sami Banizuraij, Salt Lake City, UT $569<br />
15 Rocky Eniso, Glendale, CA $569<br />
16 Gideon Cross, Los Angeles, CA $482<br />
17 Bobby Binsky, Miami, FL $482<br />
18 Yarom Limor, Beverly Hills, CA $482</center></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m keeping tabs on these big-little tourneys via <a href="http://pokergossip.com">Steve Hall</a>. </p>
<p>UPDATE: Steve tells me that Vinnie is playing these minor league Commerce tournaments for Men the Master. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/player-to-watch-vinnie-vinh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tournament Time-Lapse</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/tournament-time-lapse/</link>
		<comments>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/tournament-time-lapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Michalski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pokerati Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Hold'em Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce-casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt-Savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker-videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=11973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Semi-interesting video from Steve Hall and Michael Chung &#8230; an overhead time-lapse shot of one of the events going on at the Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series in California. The plot of this silent short-film: You&#8217;ll see a packed field piddling in pots early, and they seem to do that for awhile, but then things really pick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semi-interesting video from Steve Hall and Michael Chung &#8230; an overhead time-lapse shot of one of the events going on at the <a href="http://commercecasino.com/tournamentDetails.aspx?tournamentId=5">Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series</a> in California.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NFbkeMYnpOY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NFbkeMYnpOY&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>The plot of this silent short-film: You&#8217;ll see a packed field piddling in pots early, and they seem to do that for awhile, but then things really pick up as bustouts accelerate and tables break &#8212; boom-boom-boom! And not to give away the ending, but the climax comes not with a final table, but a dramatic pan that makes you realize this event is even bigger than you thought it was &#8230; but this time, when players are gone, it could be because they&#8217;re just on break &#8230;</p>
<p>(Sigh.)</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://pokergossip.com">PokerGossip.com for more of the ongoings at the Commerce</a>, where Matt Savage&#8217;s experimental lower-middle-stakes festival is still going strong-ish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/tournament-time-lapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series: Ironman Event and Other Curious Tourneys</title>
		<link>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/commerce-holdem-series/</link>
		<comments>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/commerce-holdem-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Michalski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Hold'em Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce-casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ironman tournaments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payout-structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tournament schedules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerati.com/?p=11742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series just got underway yesterday in California. It&#8217;s a 2+ week festival with limit, no-limit, and pot-limit hold&#8217;em tourneys &#8230; most of them in the $200, $300, and $500 range &#8230; and some with fun little twists such as knockout bounties and creative payout structures. They got off to a good start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commercecasino.com/tournamentDetails.aspx?tournamentId=5"><img src="http://commercecasino.com/images/uploads/tournament_CHS-Logo-09.jpg" align="right"></a>The <a href="http://commercecasino.com/tournamentDetails.aspx?tournamentId=5">Commerce Hold&#8217;em Series just got underway</a> yesterday in California. It&#8217;s a 2+ week festival with limit, no-limit, and pot-limit hold&#8217;em tourneys &#8230; most of them in the $200, $300, and $500 range &#8230; and some with fun little twists such as knockout bounties and creative payout structures. They got off to a good start with 1,217 entries on Day 1A in their $220 NLH &#8212; with a $500k guarantee &#8212; and It all culminates in a $2,580 main event (also with a $500k guarantee). </p>
<p>But the event that&#8217;s most intriguing to me: <strong>Event #15 &#8212; a $1,600 &#8220;Ironman&#8221; tourney</strong>, on Wednesday, Sep 23.</p>
<p>The concept, from a Commerce spokesman:</p>
<blockquote><p>$1600 Ironman Tournament.  10,000 in starting chips.  1 hour levels starting at 25-50, with slow progressions.  Includes 50-75, 250-500, 900-1800 blinds.  The key is that there are no breaks!  We will play from start to finish without interruption.  3 meals provided as long as you are in the tournament.  Must play down to one player.  Paying only the final table with 50% for first.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow. Awesome. Cool. While part of me thinks this might-should be called the Meth-head Invitational, it will be really interesting to see who plays the best under those conditions. Short-stacked smokers at a disadvantage, but hey &#8230; them&#8217;s the (only) breaks. </p>
<p>UPDATE: Event #1 seems pretty unique, too. Each Day 1 plays down to 27, and 90 players have already made the money. An additional funky caveat &#8212; those who have already busted can re-enter on Day 1B or Day 1C. What-the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerati.com/2009/09/commerce-holdem-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: pokerati.com @ 2012-05-27 04:16:08 -->
