How a Bill May or May Not Become a Law, Part 5

UIGEA fixer-upper/TRO faces first vote-hurdle next week

Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas did another one of his WSOP fly-ins for a couple days — manning the hallway booth and meeting with pros — but much of his time was spent away from the Amazon and in his room at the Rio, on the phone/computer/Blackberry with Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) et al. about HR 5767 — which is scheduled to be voted on in committee Wednesday or Thursday. While getting this bill on the agenda brings the notion of pre-UIGEA poker one step closer to reality, the measure also faces the threat of being voted down and derailed ’til next year or never.

It’s supposedly an all-in push that should hold up … and if HR 5767 — co-sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) and 17 19 others — passes muster in House Financial Services, of which Frank is the chair, then it moves to the floor of Congress for a vote — preferably having shown strong bipartisan support in committee.

So what does this mean for you, the non-political poker types who are fine-and-dandy with playing unofficial WSOP satellites on Full Tilt and PokerStars? More fish, basically … and poker industry people would in some way or another have a say in what may or may not constitute Unlawful Internet Gambling that the Treasury Dept. could look into/stop. (You know, like online site owners who peek at hole cards … that should be unlawful, right?)

As written, however, the bill probably wouldn’t pass — it basically just says: Hey, Treasury Dept., you can’t enforce the enforcement act, so don’t even try! But it’s being redrafted — not so much on behalf of poker-player civil liberties, but for the banks, who have already testified that they need a lot of help before they can figure out what to make of this whole online gambling financial transaction stuff … and until then, without this law, might be forced to block expressly legal enterprises. (Horse racing, for example, is apparently running into a lot of problems with US banks, even though the UIGEA specifically said they were in the clear.) So with exemptions not being exempted, a redrafted HR 5767 will push to suspend the UIGEA (kinda like a temporary restraining order) until the banks and Congress catch up with technology, which could well take a long time nd involve international treaties … so we don’t want to penalize legal businesses in the interim.

So with all that said, now would be a good time for concerned poker citizens to send letters to members of Congress, voicing support for sensible legislation to move forward next week.

Click here to use the PPA’s Contact-your-Congresspeeps letter generator. If I’ve learned one thing since going through a similar stage in Texas and talking with the Federales, it’s that while constituent letters sent randomly can sometimes irritate a Congressional staff, targeted efforts at specific times (like now) can be quite effective, and often make the difference in tipping the leanings of a representative who may or may not really care in your favor.

Right now, really, internet gambling laws are hardly registering on the Congressional radar — even the bill’s cosponsor, Ron Paul, hardly has them included on his list of hot/important issues. That’s why getting HR 5767 to a committee vote is such a big step … because if it passes, then it helps guarantee that poker issues will be at least a small part of the national debate.


Posted by DanM on June 20, 2008 at 7:33 pm

One Comment to “How a Bill May or May Not Become a Law, Part 5

UIGEA fixer-upper/TRO faces first vote-hurdle next week


  1. Mean Gene
    Says:

    Sadly, this Congress is far too interested in stripping away our civil liberties for there to be much hope they’ll give any of them back to us.

Need an avatar? Get one here!

Leave a Comment